Hi there, am not trying a PXE boot but I am trying to have the kernel image on
flash and boot Solaris off that image and try to mount the root alone on the
nfs.
Also this is possible in Linux where we boot the kernel off a flash and
mount the root on the nfs and I am trying to get the sa
Hi I am booting solaris on an x86 machine with the image installed solaris on a
flash drive and have another system running solaris with its root file system
exported on the nfs.
On the system which uses the flash I modified the /boot/solaris/bootenv.rc file
as follows: -
I changed
setprop b
You can do it either ways.
Both should be fine
Thanks,
Tirthankar
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On Dec 5, 2007 5:50 PM, Robin du <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> after upgrade a new bfu archive(20071119 64bit), my system hangs here:
> ***
> *
> *starting Desktop login on display :0 ...
> *
> *waiting for the Desktop Login screen before login
Hi I am booting solaris on an x86 machine with the image installed solaris on a
flash drive and have another system running solaris with its root file system
exported on the nfs.
On the system which uses the flash I modified the /boot/solaris/bootenv.rc file
as follows: -
I changed
setprop b
Yes, it works!
Thank you!
Tom
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
I started with b74, then created an alt BE and lu'd it to b77.
b77 had problems with the FC disks attached, and never booted sucessfully.
Should I wipe that, clone b74 again and then upgrade to b78 over that?
Or can I upgrade the b77 BE directly to b78?
(on another note, anyone know for sure i
On Dec 5, 2007 7:48 PM, Tom Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have very limited experience to Solaris Sparc system. I am eager to know
> how to better use Network Management Port.
>
> Currently, I am using Serial management port to control the SunFire V215
> blade server and it works
Hello,
I have very limited experience to Solaris Sparc system. I am eager to know how
to better use Network Management Port.
Currently, I am using Serial management port to control the SunFire V215 blade
server and it works greatly.
Now, I want to to control another one that is far from my o
Steven Sim wrote:
> Moinak Ghosh;
>
> Thanks for your very swift reply!
>
> Forgive me for asking what may be a simple question...but could I have
> the tag syntax <> for the usb entries...?
I saw some email thread in the libvirt discussion alias about a patch
for supporting tag syntax for
> > Your comments on
> > choice of shell make most people press the delete
> > button.
>
> Their loss. And their prerogative to do so. That's
> how it is meant to function.
No, not their loss, it is their choice. Rubbishing something that works for
other people is not going to win you friends or
Alan Coopersmith wrote:
ludo wrote:
got the same bjorken experiencehaving some useless emails about bug
updates like:
Believe or not, those e-mails are far less broken than they used to be - still
not very good, but a step forward.
sad... Will escalate some how,
Escala
David Lloyd wrote:
> But why would this stop Indiana from being released, presuming Indiana
> some form of Sun blessed products? Given that the current SXCE contains
> this proprietary code and it can be obtained for free, so could Indiana
> contain this proprietary code and be obtained for f
> > "Give me more Chinese and we'll
> > > finish the Great wall sooner"
> > >
> http://www.sampioni.com/en/Legenda/erich.htm#Note
> >
> > > UNIX admin
> >
> > I find you language very offensive, even though it
> is
> > under quotes. Please keep yourself under control.
>
> Which language do you
Moinak Ghosh;
Thanks for your very swift reply!
Forgive me for asking what may be a simple question...but could I have
the tag syntax <> for the usb entries...?
usb=1
usbdevice='tablet'
Should be under right?
Here is my XML dump file..
# virsh dumpxml winxp1
winxp1
b2c194de57e31f9a57d5
Steven Sim wrote:
> Hello Gurus;
>
> I've installed Nevada built 77 and successfully booted Nevada as Dom0
> and xVM as the Hypervisor.
>
> # xm info
> host : solaris-devx
> release: 5.11
> version: snv_77
> machine: i86pc
> nr_cpus
> That seems a rather arbitrary constraint. There is
> value in producing
> releases even if they're only for x86 at the moment.
>
> The target audience for Indiana is probably not
> running SPARC, so
> there is significant value in producing just one
> arch.
>
> Not only that, producing for more
Hello Gurus;
I've installed Nevada built 77 and successfully booted Nevada as Dom0
and xVM as the Hypervisor.
# xm info
host : solaris-devx
release : 5.11
version : snv_77
machine : i86pc
nr_cpus : 4
nr_nodes
Hi I am booting solaris on an x86 machine with the image installed solaris on a
flash drive and have another system running solaris with its root file system
exported on the nfs.
On the system which uses the flash I modified the /boot/solaris/bootenv.rc file
as follows: -
I changed
setprop b
> "Give me more Chinese and we'll
> > finish the Great wall sooner"
> > http://www.sampioni.com/en/Legenda/erich.htm#Note
>
> > UNIX admin
>
> I find you language very offensive, even though it is
> under quotes. Please keep yourself under control.
Which language do you find offensive? If you t
"Give me more Chinese and we'll
> finish the Great wall sooner"
> http://www.sampioni.com/en/Legenda/erich.htm#Note
> UNIX admin
I find you language very offensive, even though it is under quotes. Please
keep yourself under control.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_
> It's promising to see that Mac OS X, a strong BSD
> UNIX, is looking
> more and more like Solaris with every new release. Go
> play with
> Leopard if you get a chance.
>
> -john
>
Yes, Mac OS is probably trying to catch up with Solaris. But do you think
Solaris will be allowed to stand s
Hi,
after upgrade a new bfu archive(20071119 64bit), my system hangs here:
***
*
*starting Desktop login on display :0 ...
*
*waiting for the Desktop Login screen before login
*
ctrl + alt + backspace
> Your comments on
> choice of shell make most people press the delete
> button.
Their loss. And their prerogative to do so. That's how it is meant to function.
> Unfortunately, such things do affect quality;
> people
> can only work so many hours a day.
>
> Yes, but more hands make light work
24 matches
Mail list logo
