If you want just x86, then nexenta as a distro has all necessary
OpenLDAP and various language/db supported packages.
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 11:22 PM, Edwin Goei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In particular, I'm looking for binary packages for an LDAP server that
> runs on opensolaris sparc mainly,
Ken Gunderson writes:
> On Fri, 07 Mar 2008 09:15:36 -0800
> Edwin Goei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > James Carlson wrote:
> > > Edwin Goei writes:
> > >
> > >> I'm trying to checkout source code just for sshd. Is there a way to
> > >> check out only a subtree of onnv-gate?
> > >>
> >
>
> Plse see Roberto's blog which shows screenshots of
> running Microsoft Window$98 inside a Sparc system,
> using QEMU:
>
> http://www.kraftek.com/blog/index.php?/archives/244-A-
> Netra-T1-SPARC-running-Windows98-using-Qemu.html
>
> Again, since VirtualBox is pretty much based on QEMU,
> I wo
On Fri, 07 Mar 2008 09:15:36 -0800
Edwin Goei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> James Carlson wrote:
> > Edwin Goei writes:
> >
> >> I'm trying to checkout source code just for sshd. Is there a way to
> >> check out only a subtree of onnv-gate?
> >>
> >
> > No. Mercurial doesn't do subtrees.
> > Roberto has clearly stated in his own forum that
> the
> > dependencies can be satisfied with installation of
> > required Blastwave.org packages. Please excuse me
> > for my ignorance, but wouldn't this dispose of the
> > need for "integration"?
>
> No.
>
> Blastwave is good for casual use,
> To get to my main question, what free tools can I use
> to make an Ultra
> 10 run Solaris 10 (or OpenSolaris) along with Linux?
> Or Windows*?
> * I don't really care to run Windows.. but the
> marketing pages claimed
> it is possible.. which implies that either x86
> w/BIOS are being
> emulate
James Carlson wrote:
Edwin Goei writes:
I'm trying to checkout source code just for sshd. Is there a way to
check out only a subtree of onnv-gate?
No. Mercurial doesn't do subtrees.
I was not able to find out so I
am checking out all of it, but it is quite large. How much disk sp
Edwin Goei writes:
> I'm trying to checkout source code just for sshd. Is there a way to
> check out only a subtree of onnv-gate?
No. Mercurial doesn't do subtrees.
> I was not able to find out so I
> am checking out all of it, but it is quite large. How much disk space do
> I need?
It's cur
> It's just a hack. Use it and be happy. If it works
> for you, fine, if not, make it better, it's open
> source. It is not meant to be an "integrated" thing
> into opensolaris. Noone else mentioned anything about
> "integration" in this forum.
>
> Thanks
>
> - rdircio
> - http://www.kraftek.com
Hi,
I have a problem when I try to init manually ldapclient and LDAP server is
running in SSL mode:
following the command:
ldapclient -v manual -a credentialLevel=proxy -a
AuthenticationMethod=tls:simple -a proxyDN=cn=root,dc=alu,dc=com -a
proxyPassword=newuser1 -a defaultSearchBase=ou=Users,ou=
Thanks ux-admin,
I saw that path and have no idea where it's coming from or where to fix it.
to build the pam-1.0.2 package all that was done was a phpize, confgure and
make install. I searched all of those paths and files (nada). The other
possibility was php.ini and that is set to /usr/lib/se
It's just a hack. Use it and be happy. If it works for you, fine, if not, make
it better, it's open source. It is not meant to be an "integrated" thing into
opensolaris. Seems you're the one that wants it to be "integrated", since noone
else said anything about it in this forum.
Thanks
- rdirc
UNIX admin wrote:
>> I was hoping that it might work nevertheless - we've
>> been using an 8
>> core Proliant DL140 G3 with snv_66 for some time with
>> excellent results
>> on a range of workloads.
>
> hp doesn't have "try before you buy"?
>
Not for this level of machine on any channels avai
> I was hoping that it might work nevertheless - we've
> been using an 8
> core Proliant DL140 G3 with snv_66 for some time with
> excellent results
> on a range of workloads.
hp doesn't have "try before you buy"?
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_
> Roberto has clearly stated in his own forum that the
> dependencies can be satisfied with installation of
> required Blastwave.org packages. Please excuse me
> for my ignorance, but wouldn't this dispose of the
> need for "integration"?
No.
Blastwave is good for casual use, but not more than t
>
> Official statement regarding Solaris support from hp:
> http://h18004.www1.hp.com/products/servers/software/solaris/index.html?jumpid=reg_R1002_USEN
>
> Note that DL320 is not on the list:
> Solaris on ProLiant - certified & supported versions:
> http://h71028.www7.hp.com/enterprise/cache/493
> > It's obvious one can recompile and link the
> binaries
> > somewhere else like /opt/NX.
> > It's easy.
>
> Recompiling is the easy part. Integration is the hard
> one. And if you're bogged down in tons and tons of
> other engineering work, it's too much effort to spare
> on one more thing.
Ro
> We're looking at potentially getting this [1] or
> similar for a
> fileserver, but I can't find any conclusive data on
> whether Solaris will
> run on it.
...
> [1]
> http://h18006.www1.hp.com/products/storageworks/dl320s
> _ss/
Official statement regarding Solaris support from hp:
http://h1800
> /usr/lib/security//usr/lib/security/pam_unix_auth.so.1
Look carefully at that path.
You're linking it wrong. Are you familiar with ld(1), and how to control the
linking process properly?
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-di
> It's obvious one can recompile and link the binaries
> somewhere else like /opt/NX.
> It's easy.
Recompiling is the easy part. Integration is the hard one. And if you're bogged
down in tons and tons of other engineering work, it's too much effort to spare
on one more thing.
This message po
20 matches
Mail list logo
