Jim Grisanzio wrote:
location. Just a suggestion. That conversation will be on website-discuss.
I can see how it comes to be there, and at least it is *somewhere*, but
it seems wrong
to me. Maintenance of a coherent roadmap should be a function of project
leadership
(and from my point of
They're HP ProLiant PCs, I've seen a message inside HP forums which deals with
the same problem on win2003, it seems that this issue has not beed resolved.
Anyway, I'll try to ask, but I won't hold my breath while waiting for the
answer :)
Best regards.
Maurilio.
This message posted from
Hi,
Is it possible to upgrade obp without having an Operating system
installed on a Sparc hardware. I have read that (on different forums)
it is not possible. But maybe there is a way for that? Maybe having a
bootable live cd or?
Regards.
___
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 12:46 PM, Ken Mays [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A bit of follow-up on things on the Blastwave IPS depot server and StarGazer.
1. http://blastwave.network.com:1
This is a work in progress and there is no promise, yet, that
anything works there, yet.
2.
I believe the plan is to discontinue SXCE as soon as
Indiana contains everything available in SXCE (like
Jumpstart, text based installer, etc.)
Alright, I can live with that (Indiana becomes new SXCE) too. But Shawn stated
here
Ivan Wang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe the plan is to discontinue SXCE as soon as
Indiana contains everything available in SXCE (like
Jumpstart, text based installer, etc.)
Alright, I can live with that (Indiana becomes new SXCE) too. But Shawn
stated here
I've never attempted to do this from CD, but I don't see why not. I have
updated OBP by running an executable file located in the root of a boot
drive. I see no reason why you couldn't do the same when booted in
single-user mode from a CD, although you may have to copy the file to
/tmp first...
Shawn Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As long as ON does not compile on any opensolaris based distro (and
Indiana is
such a distro), shuting down SXCE would shut down the possibility to
compile
ON.
Actually, ON does compile on OpenSolaris 2008.05. There were outside
reports of
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 9:27 AM, Joerg Schilling
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shawn Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As long as ON does not compile on any opensolaris based distro (and
Indiana is
such a distro), shuting down SXCE would shut down the possibility to
compile
ON.
Shawn Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With the advent of OpenSolaris 2008.05, there shouldn't be any missing bits.
As this is essential for OpenSolaris, I would be happy if such things
would be discussed in the open. There are many other discussion I would
happily miss in favor of important
When Sun Studio 12 is the base for OpenSolaris builds, does anyone know which
version of the C++ compiler will be utilized? In particular I'm looking for
Sun C++ 5.9 SunOS_i386 Patch 124864-01 2007/07/25
as a minimum
Thanks,
Jim
This message posted from opensolaris.org
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 2:24 PM, Omer Faruk Sen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Is it possible to upgrade obp without having an Operating system
installed on a Sparc hardware. I have read that (on different forums)
it is not possible. But maybe there is a way for that? Maybe having a
bootable
On Sat, 10 May 2008, GNU Watch wrote:
I have heard nothing but broken promises from Ian Murdock and other
big whigs at sun saying that opensolaris will be released under the
GPLv3. Many developers dont want to invest time to opensolaris until
it is under the GPLv3 because the CDDL doesnt
I searched and search and found nowhere where Jonathan or anyone said
that they would promise that OpenSolaris would be released under
GPLv.anything. All I see in the URLs you reference is hearsay from
sloppy tech journalists.
So if no promise was made, how would it be broken? It may be
well I am not going to post any more responses in reguards to this thread i
started as a mater of fact this will be my last thread. I just wanted to get
feed back from others to see how you all feel. I hold you all with the up most
respect and appreciate the overwelming feedback. Even though
ok this will be my last post. Take care all.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Thank you for being proactive on this Jim.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Jim Grizanzo wrote:
I don't mean to imply that the Website CG will maintain it, per say,
just that it's on the list of content items to be reviewed because it's
no longer being maintained by anyone, that's all. Personally, I think
the road map should live with the OGB, and that's what I'll argue
18 matches
Mail list logo
