When: Thursday, Sept. 25, 2008
Where: Sun's Santa Clara Campus Mansion
(SCA07 just across the road from the Auditorium)
What: Security technologies to confine flawed and malicious software
Time: 7:30pm-10:00pm
You are invited to hear Stephen Smalley, of the US National Security Agency
(NS
Hi Peter
It is as followings
passwd: compat files nis
shadow: compat files nis
group: files nis
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 9:36 AM, Yue Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi everyone
>>
>> I have a host installed with NIS+ client. There is a user named jsn in
>> NIS server. His log
Joerg,
I do not know if VT8237R is ahci-compliant - it was not yet verified to
work with the Solaris ahci driver (VT8251 was verified).
Is BIOS mentioning somewhere AHCI mode?
Using Knopix, find the pci vendor id/device id of this controller. You
can try to add /etc/driver_aliases file either
Milan Jurik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There are three possibilities on some SATA controllers:
>
> a) operate in "Legacy mode" - for compatibility reasons - not available
> in SATA controller from VT8237R
>
> b) operate in SATA mode - this one could work with ahci driver in your
> case, maybe
T
Joerg,
Joerg Schilling pÃÅ¡e v po 22. 09. 2008 v 19:14 +0200:
> Milan Jurik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > It is a MSI K8T Master2-FAR7
> > >
> >
> > No way to switch that additional SATA controller to "pATA legacy mode".
> > AHCI support of this controller isn't very good also. Could you l
I know a number of Jive updates have been posted in various forums, but
he is the latest update.
Bill put a workaround in place last week that was syncing the forums
every few hours 'manually', which seems to be working. In addition, Bill
and Martin have made some changes to the underlying gate
Milan Jurik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It is a MSI K8T Master2-FAR7
> >
>
> No way to switch that additional SATA controller to "pATA legacy mode".
> AHCI support of this controller isn't very good also. Could you look at
What do you understand here by "this controller isn't very good also"?
Hi Joerg,
V po, 22. 09. 2008 v 18:15, Joerg Schilling píše:
> Milan Jurik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Would it help to add a line:
> > >
> > > ahci "pciclass,010400"
> > >
> > > to /etc/driver_aliases?
> >
> No, it wouldn't, the only way is to switch in BIOS
> >
> > >
> > > or
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 08:55:37AM -0600, Rob Thurlow wrote:
>
> Since we don't parse CIFS ACLs yet, the ownership and perms
> are all fictional. By default, the perms on the root directory
> are the same as the perms on the underlying directory. We
> support controls to override this - see moun
Milan Jurik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Would it help to add a line:
> >
> > ahci "pciclass,010400"
> >
> > to /etc/driver_aliases?
>
> No, it wouldn't, the only way is to switch in BIOS
>
> >
> > or something else?
> >
>
> Is it that SATA as additional "sata" interface (aka additi
>The amd64 issue you raise is an interesting one. Something we should
>care quite a bit about, actually. We already have computers with 4 GB of
>RAM being a common thing. With 8 GB and more, 32-bit will be more and
>more of a problem - and amd64 is the only really serious way forward.
>
>I don'
Hi Joerg,
V po, 22. 09. 2008 v 17:58, Joerg Schilling píše:
> Pawel Wojcik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Solaris does not support (so far) SATA controllers that advertise
> > themselves as RAID controllers. Your VIA controller shows pci
> > class-code 00010400. Try to change BIOS setting
The amd64 issue you raise is an interesting one. Something we should
care quite a bit about, actually. We already have computers with 4 GB of
RAM being a common thing. With 8 GB and more, 32-bit will be more and
more of a problem - and amd64 is the only really serious way forward.
I don't know
Hi all,
> My Solaris installation stops at 97% while installing SUNWdfb package.
> Can anyone please let me know why this is happening.
> I was installing Solaris Nevada build 84 with crossbow-bits.
>
> Regards,
> Samir
>
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing
Hi all,
My Solaris installation stops at 97% while installing SUNWdfb package.
Can anyone please let me know why this is happening.
I was installing Solaris Nevada build 84 with crossbow-bits.
Regards,
Samir
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensola
Pawel Wojcik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Solaris does not support (so far) SATA controllers that advertise
> themselves as RAID controllers. Your VIA controller shows pci
> class-code 00010400. Try to change BIOS setting to use either IDE or
> AHCI mode for this controller/ I am not sure t
Johan Kragsterman schrieb:
> But when I wanted to start to play with the web admin interface of
> zfs it didn´t show up @ https://localhost:6789 , as it should,
> according to all posts I´ve been reading. I tried different things
> like the ip adress instead of localhost, and the servername, with o
Hi Bill,
> Subject:
> Re: [osol-discuss] firefox problems with snv_98
> From:
> Bill Shannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date:
> Sun, 21 Sep 2008 23:35:59 -0700
>
> To:
> Ginn Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> CC:
> opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
>
>
> Ginn Chen wrote:
>
>>> >> It would be nice if there
Bill Shannon wrote:
> ...
> But I do see a long stream of
>
> no printer added since last 60 secs
>
> which seems to come from
>
> http://hg.opensolaris.org/sc/src/presto/ospm/trunk/applet/ospm-hal-support.c
>
> Another bug?
>
This is the printer autodetction applet. Yes, another bug.
Will f
19 matches
Mail list logo