Hi Bill,
> Subject: > Re: [osol-discuss] firefox problems with snv_98 > From: > Bill Shannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: > Sun, 21 Sep 2008 23:35:59 -0700 > > To: > Ginn Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > CC: > opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org > > > Ginn Chen wrote: > >>> >> It would be nice if there was more information than "it's broken". >>> >> I can't tell if the problems I'm having are the same problems >>> >> reported above. >>> >> > > Firefox 3 in snv_97/snv_98 has several issues. >> > e.g. >> > Bookmarks are missing. >> > Bookmarks could not be saved. >> > Bookmarks could not be renamed. >> > Can't import/export bookmarks. >> > Firefox coredumps at startup. >> > Firefox couldn't work with libumem.so, >> > > I'm curious... What kind of testing was done before release that none of > these problems were discovered? I would think the first one would've > been discovered immediately had anyone actually used it before release. > There is a bug filed against the bookmark issue in bugster during the test cycle of snv_97, http://monaco.sfbay.sun.com/detail.jsf?cr=6736315. This is a regression bug between snv_96 and snv_97, because dev. engineer submit one new patch. From the evaluation, the coredump issue just happens on a special enviroment. QE is working on new GNOME version integration, the full test for all desktop applications are executed on another branch of desktop build, there are only Desktop sanity test on snv build. The new GNOME version will be integrated into snv build99. > And what turned out to be the root cause of these problems? > _______________________________________________ > opensolaris-discuss mailing list > opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org > _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
