Re: [osol-discuss] [desktop-discuss] FF3 stability and performance concerns

2008-10-30 Thread Martin Bochnig
More Firefox Bloat? Say It Ain't So, Mozilla http://www.wired.com/software/coolapps/news/2007/05/firefox_bloat On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 6:34 AM, Jason King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 10:50 PM, Martin Bochnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 4:30 AM,

Re: [osol-discuss] [desktop-discuss] FF3 stability and performance concerns

2008-10-30 Thread Martin Bochnig
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 4:30 AM, Glynn Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 31/10/2008, at 3:58 PM, Martin Bochnig wrote: >> >> But shipping FF3 as default browser undermines efforts like this (in >> your own distros SXCE and Indiana), because on this end you waste 10 >> times the resources that

Re: [osol-discuss] [desktop-discuss] FF3 stability and performance concerns

2008-10-30 Thread Glynn Foster
On 31/10/2008, at 3:58 PM, Martin Bochnig wrote: > But shipping FF3 as default browser undermines efforts like this (in > your own distros SXCE and Indiana), because on this end you waste 10 > times the resources that others are trying to save piece for piece (in > their distros). Why don't you mo

[osol-discuss] FF3 stability and performance concerns

2008-10-30 Thread Martin Bochnig
Yesterday I upgraded my Blade 100 (Hundred) to SXCE snv_101. I want to use this box as save-electricity 24x7 general-purpose lightweight www-client, to read pdf's, lern, keep gmail's chat and email open, perform small compiles. I don't expect a 500MHz UltraSPARC IIe machine to run very quickly, alt