Re: [osol-discuss] How to know free memory of solaris system?

2008-10-31 Thread Mike Gerdts
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 9:30 PM, zhihui Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > intel7# vmstat 2 > kthr memorypagedisk faults cpu > r b w swap free re mf pi po fr de sr rm s0 s1 -- in sy cs us sy > id > 5 0 0 7588092 5866084 8 163 7 6 18 0 124 -2

[osol-discuss] How to know free memory of solaris system?

2008-10-31 Thread zhihui Chen
I have a system with 12GB memory, but vmstat and echo ::memstat | mdb -k show different free memory. For example, vmstat shows about 7GB free memory while ::memstat shows 10GB free memory. If I try to run java with 8GB heap size, it will fail to malloc such big heap. intel7# prtconf | more System

Re: [osol-discuss] [desktop-discuss] [indiana-discuss] FF3 stability and performance concerns

2008-10-31 Thread Harry Lu
Nicolas Williams wrote: > On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 09:13:46PM +1300, Ian Collins wrote: > >> That's an odd comment, considering most reviews of FF3 I've seen >> commends it for being both faster and leaking less memory tan its >> predecessor. >> > > See: > > 6755391 sqlite3 should not be bui

[osol-discuss] ncds driver 64 bit

2008-10-31 Thread Joerg Schilling
What is the reason for not having a 64 bit version of the ncrs driver? I just installed a Dawicontrol board with the Symbios Logic 53c895 chip but it does not work as there is only a 32 bit ncrs driver. Jörg -- EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin [EMAIL PROTECT

[osol-discuss] JIST Test Suite Released

2008-10-31 Thread Joel Buckley
Joel Buckley and Jeff Bonds, from the Storage Systems Products Group, have released the Java Technology-based Interoperability System/Software/Storage TestSuite (JIST). JIST Includes: ANSI T10/T11 Fibre Channel Target from Single Initiator Test Suite ANSI T10 SCSI (SPC/SBC) Disk from Single Initi

Re: [osol-discuss] opensolaris release aliases

2008-10-31 Thread Jim Walker
opps... please disregard. Cheers, Jim ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org

[osol-discuss] opensolaris release aliases

2008-10-31 Thread Jim Walker
1st email [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org 2nd email [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Jim Walker, http://blogs.sun.com/jwalker Sun Microsystems, Software, Solaris QE x77744, 500 Eldorado Blvd, Broomfield CO 80021 ___ ope

Re: [osol-discuss] Seeking OpenSolaris help for Fluendo

2008-10-31 Thread Edward Pilatowicz
hm. i missed the "codeina" part, which after some web searching, i guess it handles the finding, purchasing, downloading, installing, and updating of fluendo codecs? if so then cool. ed On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 11:12:24AM -0700, Edward Pilatowicz wrote: > some comments below. > note that i'm not

Re: [osol-discuss] Seeking OpenSolaris help for Fluendo

2008-10-31 Thread Edward Pilatowicz
some comments below. note that i'm not a member of the IPS team, a packaging expert, etc. but i did buy the currently available fluendo codecs so i'm replying because i'm an interested customer. ;) ed On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 03:16:04AM -0500, Brian Cameron wrote: > > I am currently working with

Re: [osol-discuss] [indiana-discuss] FF3 stability and performance concerns

2008-10-31 Thread Nicolas Williams
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 09:13:46PM +1300, Ian Collins wrote: > That's an odd comment, considering most reviews of FF3 I've seen > commends it for being both faster and leaking less memory tan its > predecessor. See: 6755391 sqlite3 should not be built with SQLITE_DEBUG; uses access(2) too often,

Re: [osol-discuss] [desktop-discuss] FF3 stability and performance concerns

2008-10-31 Thread Scott Rotondo
Jason King wrote: > > Even worse than that, even on a Ferrari 4000 2ghz w/ 1gb ram, starting > with around sxce b98, the desktop in general seem to be suffering from > a critical performance regression, FF3 seems to be the worst in this > respect. I've seen systems where actual swapping (not pagi

Re: [osol-discuss] [desktop-discuss] FF3 stability and performance concerns

2008-10-31 Thread Mike Meyer
On Fri, 31 Oct 2008 16:30:02 +1300 Glynn Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://www.spreadfirefox.com/en-US/worldrecord/ > > indicates that there's pretty big demand generally for Firefox 3, so But copies downloaded does not equal copies in use. So that indicates there's a big demand to che

Re: [osol-discuss] [desktop-discuss] FF3 stability and performance concerns

2008-10-31 Thread Jason King
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 10:50 PM, Martin Bochnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 4:30 AM, Glynn Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On 31/10/2008, at 3:58 PM, Martin Bochnig wrote: >>> >>> But shipping FF3 as default browser undermines efforts like this (in >>> your own distro

[osol-discuss] FMA: ereport.cpu.intel.nb.ie

2008-10-31 Thread Robert Milkowski
Hello opensolaris-discuss, fmdump -e -u 3cd9bcf1-f5d0-4203-c07d-9cd31c67dae4 -V TIME CLASS Oct 31 2008 15:56:50.889995595 ereport.cpu.intel.nb.ie nvlist version: 0 class = ereport.cpu.intel.nb.ie ena = 0x1bf08f247c1 detector = (embedded nvlist

[osol-discuss] Seeking OpenSolaris help for Fluendo

2008-10-31 Thread Brian Cameron
I am currently working with some engineers at Fluendo to help them provide their media plugins for OpenSolaris and also to help make the codeina program work on both Solaris and OpenSolaris. I have a few questions I am hoping you can help with. The codeina client program sets 4 variables to iden

Re: [osol-discuss] FF3 stability and performance concerns

2008-10-31 Thread Joerg Schilling
Ian Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That's an odd comment, considering most reviews of FF3 I've seen > commends it for being both faster and leaking less memory tan its > predecessor. > > It's certainly been stable long term on my desktop since 3.0.3. > What is the last time you used it on S

Re: [osol-discuss] FF3 stability and performance concerns

2008-10-31 Thread Ian Collins
Martin Bochnig wrote: > On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 9:13 AM, Ian Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Martin Bochnig wrote: >> That's an odd comment, considering most reviews of FF3 I've seen >> commends it for being both faster and leaking less memory tan its >> predecessor. >> >> It's certainly

Re: [osol-discuss] FF3 stability and performance concerns

2008-10-31 Thread Martin Bochnig
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 9:13 AM, Ian Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Martin Bochnig wrote: > That's an odd comment, considering most reviews of FF3 I've seen > commends it for being both faster and leaking less memory tan its > predecessor. > > It's certainly been stable long term on my deskto

Re: [osol-discuss] FF3 stability and performance concerns

2008-10-31 Thread Ian Collins
Martin Bochnig wrote: > > So much for that. > FF2 has been a bit slow already (but very stable), so has FF1 at its time. > But FF3's CPU- and mem- hungriness goes over the top. > Enough is enough. > IMO they will lose market share. > > That's an odd comment, considering most reviews of FF3 I've