Martin Bochnig wrote: > On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 9:13 AM, Ian Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Martin Bochnig wrote: >> That's an odd comment, considering most reviews of FF3 I've seen >> commends it for being both faster and leaking less memory tan its >> predecessor. >> >> It's certainly been stable long term on my desktop since 3.0.3. > It depends on where you read, and which benchmarks under which > circumstances in which environments and loads and on which platforms > ... etc., done by which people ... you are looking at. > > They may be windows centric, but I've found this lot to be pretty thorough and honest in their reviews:
http://www.pcpro.co.uk/features/218316/performance.html?searchString=firefox+3 > Come here, count numbers or take even the most primitive stop-watch > with yourself, and I'm really interested if you are continuing to > insist on the speed improvements. > How can a continue to insist upon something I haven't said? -- Ian. _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
