[osol-discuss] [Annoucement] ksh93-integration update1 2008-11-14 binaries available for download (for Solaris Nevada >= B84+OpenSolaris/Indiana) ...

2008-11-14 Thread Roland Mainz
Hi! 2008-11-14: ksh93 update tarballs for Solaris Nevada+Indiana These tarballs are intended to be installed over an existing OpenSolaris >= B84 i386 or SPARC installation and provide ast-ksh.2008-11-04 >(ksh93t_20081104) and match PSARC/2008/094 ("ksh93 Update 1" ; >http://www.opensola

[osol-discuss] (no subject)

2008-11-14 Thread Glenn Lagasse
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Bcc: Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] [Fwd: [accessibility-discuss] I have some questions] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Glenn Lagasse writes: > > Several of us have been working on fixing this for a few weeks now. > > We're mostly 'there',

Re: [osol-discuss] vmware/prstat/mpstat question

2008-11-14 Thread Peter Tribble
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 9:02 AM, Patrick Ale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > When I run mpstat/prstat/vmstat in a zone, is it actually outputting > the statistics in regards of running queue, CPU usage and all of that > particular zone only? > I ask this cause I am trying to find out why one of our

[osol-discuss] some errors after image-update

2008-11-14 Thread Dieter Klünter
Hi, after a image-update to: $ cat /etc/release OpenSolaris 2008.11 snv_101a_rc1b X86 Copyright 2008 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Use is subject to license terms. Assembled 05 November 2008 I get s

Re: [osol-discuss] [Fwd: [accessibility-discuss] I have some questions]

2008-11-14 Thread James Carlson
Glenn Lagasse writes: > Several of us have been working on fixing this for a few weeks now. > We're mostly 'there', just a few loose ends to tie up as it were. The > formal release of 2008.11 should install on systems with only 512M of > ram. Cool! -- James Carlson, Solaris Networking

Re: [osol-discuss] [Fwd: [accessibility-discuss] I have some questions]

2008-11-14 Thread Glenn Lagasse
* James Carlson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Li Yuan writes: > > Hi, I am going to try open solaris, but I have to get more memory first. > > My questions are as follows. > >How forgiving is open solaris to times when the computer looses power. I > > know this can be a serious problem in windo

Re: [osol-discuss] [Fwd: [accessibility-discuss] I have some questions]

2008-11-14 Thread Casper . Dik
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >> And there are some issues we need recognize: the root archive. > >True ... a single 'bootadm update-archive' is needed after the first >boot following an upgrade. For most ordinary users, kernel upgrades >are not so frequent that it's a serious hazard. > >(We should

Re: [osol-discuss] [Fwd: [accessibility-discuss] I have some questions]

2008-11-14 Thread James Carlson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > And there are some issues we need recognize: the root archive. True ... a single 'bootadm update-archive' is needed after the first boot following an upgrade. For most ordinary users, kernel upgrades are not so frequent that it's a serious hazard. (We should still do

Re: [osol-discuss] [Fwd: [accessibility-discuss] I have some questions]

2008-11-14 Thread Casper . Dik
>UFS (not used by default anymore) includes a transaction logging >feature that's enabled by default. This also protects against >corruption in case of failure. Well, it's not as good (my a long shot) as ZFS; UFS logs meta changes, not the file content; having proper inodes but not the proper d

Re: [osol-discuss] [Fwd: [accessibility-discuss] I have some questions]

2008-11-14 Thread James Carlson
Li Yuan writes: > Hi, I am going to try open solaris, but I have to get more memory first. > My questions are as follows. >How forgiving is open solaris to times when the computer looses power. I > know this can be a serious problem in windows, but I have had no problem when > this happened w