On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 5:15 AM, Shawn Walker wrote:
> Martin Bochnig wrote:
>>
>> Hi, I believe he means, that the dependency resolution algorithm used
>> by csw (in the past with pkg-get, and also now) is suboptimal (which
>> is not a shame, as most others are, too).
>> For example, speaking in d
> Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > For any of the dependencies, it should be obvious
> that the dependencies that
> > are valid for Solaris 8 need to be installed for
> Solaris 11 too as any
> > blastwave package need to use the other probrams
> from it's own environment in
> > order to behave reliably
Martin Bochnig wrote:
Hi, I believe he means, that the dependency resolution algorithm used
by csw (in the past with pkg-get, and also now) is suboptimal (which
is not a shame, as most others are, too).
For example, speaking in directed graph language (#0), Blastwave
doesn't ensure that cycles ar
Peter Jones wrote:
I am reading the numerous articles giving reasons why people find it difficult
to adopt new operating systems..one reason is language...to be more precise its
language that the average user recognises.This may sound common sense but the
average user may not understand everyd
no
as soon as ips is as stable as it should (and will) be, then it will be good.
but changing language is for Mac'ies.
But even after changes like that and colorful flower-icons on the
desktop, I doubt OS would win the minds and hearts of Hollywood. So
forget about getting free indirect backgroun
I am reading the numerous articles giving reasons why people find it difficult
to adopt new operating systems..one reason is language...to be more precise its
language that the average user recognises.This may sound common sense but the
average user may not understand everyday technical speak...
Ended doing my own SMF service, I've attached my manifest and method script, as
well as my custom.conf.
Cheers,
Peter
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
xvnc-server.xml
Description: Binary data
xvnc-server
Description: Binary data
custom.conf
Description: Binary data
__
Joerg Schilling wrote:
> For any of the dependencies, it should be obvious that the dependencies that
> are valid for Solaris 8 need to be installed for Solaris 11 too as any
> blastwave package need to use the other probrams from it's own environment in
> order to behave reliably.
It can also r
On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 5:48 PM, Oscar del Rio wrote:
> vuthecuong wrote:
>>
>> I noticed that pkgutil intend to install other dependencies that they
>> already installed in my machine:
>> ===
>> bash-3.2# /opt/csw/bin/pkgutil --install nmap
>> Checking catalog integrity wit
vuthecuong wrote:
I noticed that pkgutil intend to install other dependencies that they already
installed in my machine:
===
bash-3.2# /opt/csw/bin/pkgutil --install nmap
Checking catalog integrity with gpg.
gpg: 2009年05月01日 10時56分49秒 ICTにDSA鍵ID A1999E90で施された署名
gpg: “Blas
On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 12:23 PM, Joerg Schilling
wrote:
> Andras Barna wrote:
>
>> it's normal.
>> blastwave "duplicates" many things
>
> Blastwave does not "duplicate" things but does what it needs to do.
>
> If Solaris did inlcude more OSS with Solaris 8, things would look different.
Hi, I b
> Was there a bug id on his issue? Reason is if it
> works ok under Windows must be checking for
> reduced-cmd-support and needs to be added support for
> checking levels of functionality mount PCFS from a
> PDA.
I found some old bugs that look quite similar
6314484 "newman 1.1 flash disk can
Andras Barna wrote:
> it's normal.
> blastwave "duplicates" many things
Blastwave does not "duplicate" things but does what it needs to do.
If Solaris did inlcude more OSS with Solaris 8, things would look different.
Jörg
--
EMail:jo...@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13
vuthecuong wrote:
> I followed below link to set up my SXCE 112_snv x86 so that I can install
> apps from blastwave.org.
> http://www.blastwave.org/howto.html
> However, forexample if I install nmap (or any other package),
> I noticed that pkgutil intend to install other dependencies that they a
Was there a bug id on his issue? Reason is if it works ok under Windows must be
checking for reduced-cmd-support and needs to be added support for checking
levels of functionality.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mai
it's normal.
blastwave "duplicates" many things
FYI: nmap *is* in SXCE
On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 12:37 PM, vuthecuong wrote:
> I followed below link to set up my SXCE 112_snv x86 so that I can install
> apps from blastwave.org.
> http://www.blastwave.org/howto.html
> However, forexample if I instal
I followed below link to set up my SXCE 112_snv x86 so that I can install apps
from blastwave.org.
http://www.blastwave.org/howto.html
However, forexample if I install nmap (or any other package),
I noticed that pkgutil intend to install other dependencies that they already
installed in my machin
UNIX admin wrote:
This isn't the place to ask,
solaris...@yahoogroups.com is more
appropriate for Solaris 10 x86 questions, please
follow up there.
You know, after thinking about this some more, I'm no longer sure that that is
correct.
OpenSolaris code base stems from Solaris 10. Do you
> This isn't the place to ask,
> solaris...@yahoogroups.com is more
> appropriate for Solaris 10 x86 questions, please
> follow up there.
You know, after thinking about this some more, I'm no longer sure that that is
correct.
OpenSolaris code base stems from Solaris 10. Do you see where I'm goin
19 matches
Mail list logo
