On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 7:59 AM, Euan Thoms e...@potensol.com wrote:
Is there an option for no-clobber (does not overwrite existing files) in the
command scp? man scp doesn' t reveal anything. I got one hit in google
which indicated that there was but perhaps that was the GNU version of scp.
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 10:46 AM, Martin Bochnig mar...@martux.org wrote:
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 7:59 AM, Euan Thoms e...@potensol.com wrote:
Is there an option for no-clobber (does not overwrite existing files) in the
command scp? man scp doesn' t reveal anything. I got one hit in google
Hi Ghee,
* The build is snv_111b (OpenSolaris 2009.06).
* /usr/sbin/print-service -q displays active print service: cups
* Files $HOME/.gtkrc-2.0 or /etc/gtk-2.0/gtkrc are not present by
default. Having created them and added the gtk-print-backends
line as you list does not
I don't know.
But would rsync be what you are in need of?
Henry
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Hi,
is it possible to link multiple machines into one storage pool using zfs?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Stewart Walters wrote:
Hi Ghee,
* The build is snv_111b (OpenSolaris 2009.06).
* /usr/sbin/print-service -q displays active print service: cups
This shows that you have switched over to CUPS as the print system.
You should *NOT* use Solaris LP Print Manager to create queue for
On 11/ 3/09 01:31 PM, Ghee Teo wrote:
Stewart Walters wrote:
Hi Ghee,
* The build is snv_111b (OpenSolaris 2009.06).
* /usr/sbin/print-service -q displays active print service: cups
This shows that you have switched over to CUPS as the print system.
You should *NOT* use Solaris LP
No. You must have a device owner as one host.
Using SunCluster you would be able to see the storage pool on two systems.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Hello everyone,
First post here so I hope it ends up in the right
forum, not all my questions are related to OSOL as
such but I hope that is OK. Right then, on to my
scenario and questions.
I've been running 2009.06 on my home server since
well june and it works like a charm, the only
I'm not sure about even mentioning this for fears snv_126 will regress if it
even gets to the opensolaris.org download page but. For the first time ever the
dell dimension e521 I've been working with, configured a bfe driver out of the
box or the snv_125 build. Did not have to install the third
Luca Morettoni wrote:
On 11/ 3/09 01:31 PM, Ghee Teo wrote:
Stewart Walters wrote:
Hi Ghee,
* The build is snv_111b (OpenSolaris 2009.06).
* /usr/sbin/print-service -q displays active print service: cups
This shows that you have switched over to CUPS as the print system.
You
On 11/ 3/09 02:28 PM, Ghee Teo wrote:
Try this:
Just in $HOME/.gtkrc-2.0 or /etc/gtk-2.0/gtkrc. Just adding the line
gtk-print-backends=file,lpr,papi,cups
Just tested, but I got the same empty windows (only file and LPD
printing). I put your line in .gtk... and into /etc/.../gtkrc but it
Looking for history on the Sun { 10_, 9_, 8_ }
SunAlert_Patch_Clusters (huge, over 1+GByte) fails
to successfully finish the Pre-Patch to renovate
(tar, untar, zip, unzip, patchadd, patchrm, etc).
Pre-patch has to be manually installed, piece by
piece .
I have NO Sun support to overcome this.
Andre Is there a ntpd v4 IPS pkg?
Andre Tried a couple of different search techniques but came up
Andre blank? Only v3?
[opal:23] pkg info SUNWntp
Name: SUNWntp
Summary: Network Time Protocol Daemon v4
Description: Network Time Protocol v4, NTP Daemon and Utilities (4.2.5)
OpenSolaris JeOS is support for VirtualBox,VMware,Xen and Virtual PC.but why it
is not support kvm?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Luca Morettoni wrote:
On 11/ 3/09 02:28 PM, Ghee Teo wrote:
Try this:
Just in $HOME/.gtkrc-2.0 or /etc/gtk-2.0/gtkrc. Just adding the line
gtk-print-backends=file,lpr,papi,cups
Just tested, but I got the same empty windows (only file and LPD
printing). I put your line in .gtk... and into
On 11/ 3/09 03:03 PM, Ghee Teo wrote:
Are you so happen to be on osol 126?
If that is the case, you will also need to have SUNWgtk2-print-cups
installed.
Anyway, please check that you have,
/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/printbackends/libprintbackend-cups.so
installed SUNWgtk2-print-cups and now
Luca Morettoni wrote:
On 11/ 3/09 03:03 PM, Ghee Teo wrote:
Are you so happen to be on osol 126?
If that is the case, you will also need to have SUNWgtk2-print-cups
installed.
Anyway, please check that you have,
/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/printbackends/libprintbackend-cups.so
installed
Stewart Walters wrote:
Mind you in my situation, my CUPS server is situated on a Debian Linux
box and CUPS on Opensolaris is configured with a /etc/cups/client.conf
file pointing to it. While I don't think it has an affect, I haven't
ruled it out yet either.
We don't use
Ghee Teo wrote:
Stewart Walters wrote:
Mind you in my situation, my CUPS server is situated on a Debian
Linux box and CUPS on Opensolaris is configured with a
/etc/cups/client.conf file pointing to it. While I don't think it
has an affect, I haven't ruled it out yet either.
We don't use
Any input would be helpful.
I just watched a nightly run for 5:07:45 ( see bottom of this message )
and bomb out with many thousands of errors. There is no README.opensolaris
to be seen anymore ( see below ) so I had to guess that Sun Studio 12
update 1 was the way to go.
So should I go back to
Thats good news!
Now I only have to wait until the scsi bugs are fixed before I can
probably use it.
(http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6893171)
Hopefully this will be soon.
Ivar
Che Kristo wrote:
Just a brief heads up that Fluendo will be releasing the DVD Player
Hi,
Hi Milan,
Francois Laagel píše v čt 29. 10. 2009 v 12:04 -0700:
Can we expect the adp driver (present in SXCE build
125) to be included into the OpenSolaris extra
repository at some point in the future? That driver
supports a bunch of old Adaptec HBAs--the AHA 2940
(aka AIC7861)
Thanks John:
The worst problem to troubleshoot is one that can not be readily
reproduced.
My new laptop a clevo M580ETU does show the problem in several
facets.
1 large transfers makes the interface go away for approx 5 minutes.
2 every day use the system goes through long (10 second)
Hi Folks,
After Belenix 0.8 Alpha which included exciting features such as the
Google Widgets, Webkit, and KDE 4.2.4 -- all built with GCC 4.4.0 in
addition to Gnome 2.26, BeleniX 0.8 Beta1 is now available with
improvements (bug fixes and functionality) to the KDE 4.3.1 desktop
and other apps
Can someone please tell me which TOE NIC cards are supported as of
2009.05 ? Or, at least, give me a pointer to where such info might be
found...
--
Erik Trimble
Java System Support
Mailstop: usca22-123
Phone: x17195
Santa Clara, CA
Timezone: US/Pacific (GMT-0800)
Orvar Korvar wrote:
Will it be possible to port it to OpenSolaris? It will depend only upon the
license they choose, right?
http://share.skype.com/sites/linux/2009/11/skype_open_source.html
Any license that qualifies as Open Source for an application should allow
shipping on OpenSolaris - it
On Nov 2, 2009, at 12:58 AM, bonso wrote:
What I would like to know is...
1- Is it posible to check if ECC is active and working or will you
just have to trust that the board/BIOS maker dont tell fibs and know
how to code? I tried with Linux but dmidecode --memory says there is
no ECC
Will it be possible to port it to OpenSolaris? It will depend only upon the
license they choose, right?
http://share.skype.com/sites/linux/2009/11/skype_open_source.html
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
Dennis Clarke wrote:
Any input would be helpful.
I just watched a nightly run for 5:07:45 ( see bottom of this message )
and bomb out with many thousands of errors. There is no README.opensolaris
to be seen anymore ( see below ) so I had to guess that Sun Studio 12
update 1 was the way to
IMHO the best approach would be to integrate the skype ibraries with an
existing client such as pidgin rather than separate out skype as a separate
application. Of course the devil will be in the details and we need to wait
and see how this pans out.
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 13:15, Alan Coopersmith
Isn't the community bug repo currently http://defect.opensolaris.org/ ???
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 13:24, Steven Stallion stall...@opensolaris.orgwrote:
Any ideas on when this issue might be addressed? In the meantime, what
is the best method for creating a new bugster entry?
Steve
It is very useful James.
BTW, I also found another open source which can blink disk:
http://sg.danny.cz/sg/sdparm.html
Another question I have is: When I add a new disk (hot-plugin), it seems it
will not be mapped automaticly. It seems I have to do stmsboot -d and
stmsboot -e. That means I
f.laa...@ieee.org said:
Yes, they do officially support Solaris starting with the 29160 (sol7 and
8!). Of course, that's an LVD adapter. If you so unlucky as to have a
single-ended SCSI backup unit as I do, and still want to use OpenSolaris to
drive it, your only recourse is to bet on SXCE in
Che Kristo wrote:
Isn't the community bug repo currently http://defect.opensolaris.org/ ???
Last I checked ON issues are still tracked in bugster...
Steve
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Correct, hopefully not for too much longer
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 13:48, Steven Stallion stall...@opensolaris.orgwrote:
Che Kristo wrote:
Isn't the community bug repo currently http://defect.opensolaris.org/???
Last I checked ON issues are still tracked in bugster...
Steve
Orvar Korvar wrote:
Will it be possible to port it to OpenSolaris? It will depend only upon the
license they choose, right?
http://share.skype.com/sites/linux/2009/11/skype_open_source.html
Open source UI, but this will still depend on a closed source library.
Functionality will depend on
Che Kristo wrote:
Correct, hopefully not for too much longer
Why? I guess I'm not firm believer in the 'bugster sucks' philosophy...
Until ON moves over and webrev supports linking to Bugzilla, I don't see
a compelling reason to transition.
Steve
___
https://imo.im/
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 7:59 AM, Euan Thoms e...@potensol.com wrote:
I don't know.
But I, personally, prefer sftp.
It works like or better than ftp, is secure, plus you can check things
by executing host commands.
With no disrespect, it doesn't work like that at all. It provides the
user
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 4:52 PM, dipper smqt15-0...@yahoo.com.cn wrote:
OpenSolaris JeOS is support for VirtualBox,VMware,Xen and Virtual PC.but why
it is not support kvm?
KVM (Kernel-based Virtual Machine) is Linux only technology. When it
was invented the developers had no intention to port
Any ideas on when this issue might be addressed? In the meantime, what
is the best method for creating a new bugster entry?
Steve
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
From what I understand there will be a closed libskype which could
feasibly ported to OpenSolaris by Skype. Skype have in the past said that
they are not against the idea of supporting our platform, it's just a matter
of priorities for them.
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 08:51, Orvar Korvar
Dennis Clarke wrote:
Any input would be helpful.
I just watched a nightly run for 5:07:45 ( see bottom of this message )
and bomb out with many thousands of errors. There is no
README.opensolaris
to be seen anymore ( see below ) so I had to guess that Sun Studio 12
update 1 was the way to
I completely agree with you, Che. It looks like this news will tantalize many
butnothing would happen since so-called 'libskype' will appear on
OpenSolaris.Since it is closed binary only company able to port it is - Skype
itself. UI isa metter of imagination and time, but main problem is, as
Steven Stallion wrote:
Any ideas on when this issue might be addressed? In the meantime, what
is the best method for creating a new bugster entry?
website-discuss would be the best place to ask about fixing website issues.
As for creating bugster reports, the options for people outside Sun
Che Kristo wrote:
Isn't the community bug repo currently http://defect.opensolaris.org/ ???
Community members can file bugs there, but for most of the OS, bugs won't
get worked on until they land in bugster since most OS engineers simply
don't see bugzilla bugs. (In part because of
Dennis Clarke wrote:
Now then ... since the OpenSolaris.org website is entirely in the hands of
Sun employees ... will someone put the README.opensolaris back ? please ?
-- this thing looks dead :
http://dlc.sun.com/osol/on/downloads/current/README.opensolaris
That's up to the ON
I'm not in the bugster sucks camp either :-) ... just having two separate
tools for the same things that irks me.
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 14:02, Steven Stallion stall...@opensolaris.orgwrote:
Che Kristo wrote:
Correct, hopefully not for too much longer
Why? I guess I'm not firm believer in
49 matches
Mail list logo
