[osol-discuss] dmar0, 0 generated a fault event when translating DMA write

2010-01-13 Thread Ronny Egner
Hi, after rebooting my Opensolaris System (b130) after I/O was hung it came up with the following messages: WARNING: dmar0,0 generated a fault event when translating DMA write on address 0x25a000 for PCI(9, 0, 0), the reason is: The Write field in a page-table entry is Clear when DMA write

[osol-discuss] 128a was the latest fairly stable build

2010-01-13 Thread Mauro Mozzarelli
129: Xen manager did not even start 130: could not even see the screen as it was all dark white I hope that build 131 will come soon and run smoothly like 128a. Thanks. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list

Re: [osol-discuss] 128a was the latest fairly stable build

2010-01-13 Thread John Martin
On 01/13/10 07:40 AM, Mauro Mozzarelli wrote: 130: could not even see the screen as it was all dark white Which graphics? If NVIDIA and you had previously manually enabled compiz, try the workaround in: http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6912450

[osol-discuss] OpenSolaris snv_130 panic.

2010-01-13 Thread Juris Krumins
Experiencing very strange behaviour with upgraded OpenSolaris machine ( from snv_124 to snv_130 ) Machine gets panic, with the following error: trap: Unknown trap type 8 in user mode. panic[cpu0]/thread = fbc2e3a0: mutex_enter: bad mutex, lp=20 owner=f000e987f000fea0

Re: [osol-discuss] OpenSolaris snv_130 panic.

2010-01-13 Thread Casper . Dik
Experiencing very strange behaviour with upgraded OpenSolaris machine ( from snv_124 to snv_130 ) Machine gets panic, with the following error: trap: Unknown trap type 8 in user mode. panic[cpu0]/thread = fbc2e3a0: mutex_enter: bad mutex, lp=20 owner=f000e987f000fea0 thread

Re: [osol-discuss] OpenSolaris snv_130 panic.

2010-01-13 Thread Juris Krumins
This is not about some specific process. All this happens when I try to boot newly created boot environment (after pkg image-update from snv_124 to snv_130 build) So when I boot kernel with kmdb enabled (using -kd flags in grub and manually run kernel) I get this. Unfortunately users using this

Re: [osol-discuss] snv_129: zfs destroy took out my system :(

2010-01-13 Thread Jack Kielsmeier
I had this EXACT SAME THING happen to me! I started a thread in zfs discuss about it: http://opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=121451tstart=15 I actually had iscsi turned off when I did the destroy. Didn't matter. I still have not been able to get my pool back. This is the 2nd time in

Re: [osol-discuss] [osol-help] 128a was the latest fairly stable build

2010-01-13 Thread Mauro Mozzarelli
Are your AMD processors actually of a type that is supported in OpenSolaris for frequency scaling? If they are family type 15 or lower, then they aren't and likely will never be because of lacking invariant TSC support. Of course, family 15 exactly. Do you think that if I had a business

Re: [osol-discuss] [osol-help] 128a was the latest fairly stable build

2010-01-13 Thread Glenn Lagasse
* Mauro Mozzarelli (opensolari...@ezplanet.net) wrote: Are your AMD processors actually of a type that is supported in OpenSolaris for frequency scaling? If they are family type 15 or lower, then they aren't and likely will never be because of lacking invariant TSC support. Of

[osol-discuss] Automount without Gnome?

2010-01-13 Thread Johann Myrkraverk Oskarsson
Hi all, I just switch (or tested, if you will) using fvmw instead fo Gnome. Now my external usb (with UFS) does not automount anymore. Is the automount feature tied to Gnome? Is there a way to get it without Gnome? Johann ___ opensolaris-discuss

Re: [osol-discuss] Automount without Gnome?

2010-01-13 Thread Artem Kachitchkine
On 01/13/10 11:07 AM, Johann Myrkraverk Oskarsson wrote: Hi all, I just switch (or tested, if you will) using fvmw instead fo Gnome. Now my external usb (with UFS) does not automount anymore. Is the automount feature tied to Gnome? Is there a way to get it without Gnome? rmvolmgr should do

Re: [osol-discuss] Automount without Gnome?

2010-01-13 Thread Artem Kachitchkine
On 01/13/10 12:17 PM, Johann Myrkraverk Oskarsson wrote: rmvolmgr should do the automounting when Nautilus is not present. Make sure this service is online: Thank you. Both hal and rmvolmgr were offline. Something had caused hal to maintenance. Just clearing it removed the issue and now

Re: [osol-discuss] 128a was the latest fairly stable build

2010-01-13 Thread Ian Collins
Mauro Mozzarelli wrote: 129: Xen manager did not even start Odd, my xVM server is running b129. 130: could not even see the screen as it was all dark white Odd, my desktop is running b130! -- Ian. ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list

Re: [osol-discuss] OpenSolaris snv_130 panic.

2010-01-13 Thread Jürgen Keil
Experiencing very strange behaviour with upgraded OpenSolaris machine ( from snv_124 to snv_130 ) Machine gets panic, with the following error: Just a wild guess... An opensolaris upgrade currently has a nasty bug that results in old kernel modules ending in the boot_archive: Bug ID:

[osol-discuss] NexentaStor 2.2.1 Developer Edition Released

2010-01-13 Thread Anil Gulecha
Hi All, I'd like to announce the immediate availability of NexentaStor Developer Edition v2.2.1. Changes since v2.2 include many bug fixes. More information: * This is a major stable release. * Storage limit increased to 4TB. * Built-in antivirus capability. * Consistent snapshots Oracle and

Re: [osol-discuss] [osol-help] 128a was the latest fairly stable

2010-01-13 Thread Anon Y Mous
It already *has* market share. Think of all the Solaris 10 deployments (from which OpenSolaris was initially started from). Not to mention the people (like Joyent) who are running OpenSolaris *today* in *production*. No, this is very much incorrect. Joyent does not run OpenSolaris Indiana

Re: [osol-discuss] [osol-help] 128a was the latest fairly stable

2010-01-13 Thread Anon Y Mous
Now, just to keep the record straight. I'm not in 100% agreement with Ben Rockwood (maybe only 96% agreement). I actually love Indiana and run it as my main day-to-day desktop OS. The problem is that you can't use Indiana as a minimal server OS in production because the Caiman installer does

Re: [osol-discuss] [osol-help] 128a was the latest fairly stable

2010-01-13 Thread Glenn Lagasse
* Anon Y Mous (music_anal...@yahoo.com) wrote: It already *has* market share. Think of all the Solaris 10 deployments (from which OpenSolaris was initially started from). Not to mention the people (like Joyent) who are running OpenSolaris *today* in *production*. No, this is very

Re: [osol-discuss] [osol-help] 128a was the latest fairly stable

2010-01-13 Thread Glenn Lagasse
* Anon Y Mous (music_anal...@yahoo.com) wrote: Now, just to keep the record straight. I'm not in 100% agreement with Ben Rockwood (maybe only 96% agreement). I actually love Indiana and run it as my main day-to-day desktop OS. The problem is that you can't use Indiana as a minimal server OS

Re: [osol-discuss] 128a was the latest fairly stable build

2010-01-13 Thread David . Comay
129: Xen manager did not even start 130: could not even see the screen as it was all dark white I hope that build 131 will come soon and run smoothly like 128a. Although I believe both of these issues have been resolved, did you examine http://defect.opensolaris.org and/or