[osol-discuss] OpenSolaris 2010.03 improvements?

2010-03-13 Thread Don Quichotte
Can anyone please tell me what the main improvements are for the upcoming OpenSolaris 2010.03, I don't just mean actual features but also updated programs. For example, what version of Firefox/Thunderbird, OpenOffice.org and VLC will be included? I know I can download developer snapshots but

Re: [osol-discuss] about zfs exported on nfs

2010-03-13 Thread Matthias Pfützner
Harry, all very bizarre... ;-) You (Harry Putnam) wrote: Matthias Pfützner matth...@pfuetzner.de writes: Harry, sorry for my first answer, now that you rephrased some of the original post, I now remember, what your initial problam really was... More inline below... It may not

Re: [osol-discuss] More about sharenfs - how to designate options

2010-03-13 Thread Matthias Pfützner
Simply put: You don't need the on option, if you specify any other options, the other options implicitly then assume on, so simply remove the on option... You (Harry Putnam) wrote: I'm not coming up with the right syntax after looking at share_nfs man page, to give options to sharenfs besides

Re: [osol-discuss] about zfs exported on nfs

2010-03-13 Thread Harry Putnam
Matthias Pfützner matth...@pfuetzner.de writes: Harry, all very bizarre... ;-) Probably do to ill informed bumbling on my part. [...] What's the output of: ls -ld /export/home/reader Does that resolve and list the user-name and group-name? yes, well no. I've found

Re: [osol-discuss] about zfs exported on nfs

2010-03-13 Thread Matthias Pfützner
You (Harry Putnam) wrote: Matthias Pfützner matth...@pfuetzner.de writes: Harry, all very bizarre... ;-) Probably do to ill informed bumbling on my part. [...] What's the output of: ls -ld /export/home/reader Does that resolve and list the user-name and

Re: [osol-discuss] OpenSolaris 2010.03 improvements?

2010-03-13 Thread Karel Gardas
Other question I'll leave to others, but certainly on b134 I see Firefix 3.5.8 and Thunderbird 3.0.x. Karel -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org

Re: [osol-discuss] OpenSolaris 2010.03 improvements?

2010-03-13 Thread B
I think that I read somewhere that Firefox 3.6 will be included in a branch after 2010.03 is released but not before, because I think that 3.6.2 is about to be released. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list

[osol-discuss] failure upgrading from snv_131 to snv_134

2010-03-13 Thread James Carlson
I just attempted to upgrade my OpenSolaris build 131 AMD64 system to build 134, and failed miserably. Here's what happened: First, since this step is normally required, I tried to do pkg install SUNWipkg. That didn't work. It failed (after downloading well over 1GB) telling me that I had to

[osol-discuss] Marvell 9128

2010-03-13 Thread Matthew Nawrocki
Hi... is the Marvell 9128 chip supported in OpenSolaris? I looked around the HCL but didn't find any instance of it. Matt -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org

Re: [osol-discuss] When system crashes, how to get log / crash info for troubleshooting

2010-03-13 Thread Jeff Freeman
Hi there - I have an almost similar situation in that I did have a panic - I thought that in /dev/zvol/rdsk the dump directory want empty so I deleted it. My system now reboots - I am trying to get a Live CD inserted so I can get back into the system. My question is - is it just a matter of

Re: [osol-discuss] When system crashes, how to get log / crash info for troubleshooting

2010-03-13 Thread Ian Collins
On 03/14/10 11:01 AM, Jeff Freeman wrote: Hi there - I have an almost similar situation in that I did have a panic - I thought that in /dev/zvol/rdsk the dump directory want empty so I deleted it. My system now reboots - I am trying to get a Live CD inserted so I can get back into the

Re: [osol-discuss] [osol-help] Interface pcn0 has been removed from kernel.

2010-03-13 Thread Jason King
I did port the fbsd driver for this (full gldv3 support, etc.) http://src.opensolaris.org/source/xref/emancipation/driver-gate/pcn/src/ It probably needs to be updated to the latest gldv3 bits (I can't remember if the gldv3 public interface stuff has been putback yet, but there were a few

Re: [osol-discuss] [osol-help] Interface pcn0 has been removed from kernel.

2010-03-13 Thread Dennis Clarke
I did port the fbsd driver for this (full gldv3 support, etc.) http://src.opensolaris.org/source/xref/emancipation/driver-gate/pcn/src/ It probably needs to be updated to the latest gldv3 bits (I can't remember if the gldv3 public interface stuff has been putback yet, but there were a few

Re: [osol-discuss] about zfs exported on nfs

2010-03-13 Thread Harry Putnam
Matthias Pfützner matth...@pfuetzner.de writes: So, if user willi on the Linux client hat UID 4711, then on the SERVER you should see 4711 as the owner of a file, that had been created by willi on a filesystems that had been mounted from the server. The server does not need to know, that 4711

Re: [osol-discuss] failure upgrading from snv_131 to snv_134

2010-03-13 Thread James Carlson
On 03/13/10 18:44, Shawn Walker wrote: On 03/13/10 03:10 PM, James Carlson wrote: I just attempted to upgrade my OpenSolaris build 131 AMD64 system to build 134, and failed miserably. Here's what happened: First, since this step is normally required, I tried to do pkg install SUNWipkg.

Re: [osol-discuss] failure upgrading from snv_131 to snv_134

2010-03-13 Thread Alan Coopersmith
James Carlson wrote: I was able to get to 134 by using bootadm update-archive but it looks like I'm going back to 131, because there's a lot that just plain doesn't work right in 134. In particular, less and telnet seem to be terribly broken -- both just appear to hang unless I press ^J. I

Re: [osol-discuss] failure upgrading from snv_131 to snv_134

2010-03-13 Thread James Carlson
On 03/13/10 22:44, Alan Coopersmith wrote: James Carlson wrote: I was able to get to 134 by using bootadm update-archive but it looks like I'm going back to 131, because there's a lot that just plain doesn't work right in 134. In particular, less and telnet seem to be terribly broken -- both

Re: [osol-discuss] failure upgrading from snv_131 to snv_134

2010-03-13 Thread Steven Stallion
On 03/13/10 22:04, James Carlson wrote: On 03/13/10 22:44, Alan Coopersmith wrote: Sounds a lot like the ptmx permissions bug in the release notes actually, which is fixable with a simple chmod. Really? The comments in that bug (particularly #26) seem to state that this was fixed in build

Re: [osol-discuss] about zfs exported on nfs

2010-03-13 Thread Edward Ned Harvey
Do you have any linux clients to osol nfs server? If not Matthias, then is there anyone else here who has an osol NFS server with a linux client, where you can show a simple `ls -l' (on the client) in a directory created on the mounted nfs share, by a linux user. I still think my original

Re: [osol-discuss] failure upgrading from snv_131 to snv_134

2010-03-13 Thread Shawn Walker
On 03/13/10 09:40 PM, James Carlson wrote: On 03/13/10 18:44, Shawn Walker wrote: On 03/13/10 03:10 PM, James Carlson wrote: I just attempted to upgrade my OpenSolaris build 131 AMD64 system to build 134, and failed miserably. Here's what happened: First, since this step is normally

Re: [osol-discuss] failure upgrading from snv_131 to snv_134

2010-03-13 Thread Shawn Walker
On 03/13/10 10:04 PM, James Carlson wrote: On 03/13/10 22:44, Alan Coopersmith wrote: James Carlson wrote: I was able to get to 134 by using bootadm update-archive but it looks like I'm going back to 131, because there's a lot that just plain doesn't work right in 134. In particular, less and

Re: [osol-discuss] failure upgrading from snv_131 to snv_134

2010-03-13 Thread Alan Coopersmith
James Carlson wrote: On 03/13/10 22:44, Alan Coopersmith wrote: James Carlson wrote: I was able to get to 134 by using bootadm update-archive but it looks like I'm going back to 131, because there's a lot that just plain doesn't work right in 134. In particular, less and telnet seem to be