Re: [osol-discuss] Asterisk

2010-04-19 Thread Ghee Teo
On 04/16/10 09:16 PM, Givon Zirkind wrote: i was able to compile asterisk 1.6.2.6 it runs. it comes up. but, is not fully configured. at the moment, i am trying to get the zaptel& ztdummy drivers the thralling peguin site has drivers, but they won't compile on opensolaris 2009.06 says u

Re: [osol-discuss] Any idea of how to deal with osol133 trying to finish part2 of the boot

2010-04-19 Thread Henry Pepper
Thank you. after hitting a key while the boot was running, it was obvious that my test script had caused an error to the environment. There where some services that wasn't running. Thanks for the hint on hitting a key for console view. Henry On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 11:48 AM, Henry Pepper wro

Re: [osol-discuss] Oracle products via IPS

2010-04-19 Thread Ghee Teo
On 04/18/10 09:45 AM, Bob Palowoda wrote: I have rather a basic question. Considering IPS is a core technology of OpenSolaris distribution and is a key component of any future release of Solaris for Oracle. Does Oracle plan to distribute their Oracle DB and other supporting applications with

[osol-discuss] Is rolemod only for uid < 1024 ?

2010-04-19 Thread Henry Pepper
Hi I get an error ERROR: Roles must be modified with ''rolemod''. when running /usr/sbin/usermod -c 'Super-User' -d /sub_home/root -e ' ' -f 0 -g 0 -u 0 -s /usr/bin/ksh root And Users must be modified with ``usermod''. When running /usr/sbin/rolemod -c 'Default tut' -d /export/home/tut -e ' '

Re: [osol-discuss] Is rolemod only for uid < 1024 ?

2010-04-19 Thread Casper . Dik
>Hi > >I get an error > ERROR: Roles must be modified with ''rolemod''. >when running /usr/sbin/usermod -c 'Super-User' -d /sub_home/root -e ' >' -f 0 -g 0 -u 0 -s /usr/bin/ksh root > >And Users must be modified with ``usermod''. > When running /usr/sbin/rolemod -c 'Default tut' -d /export/home/

[osol-discuss] snv_134 panics

2010-04-19 Thread Yariv Graf
Hi, I'm working with snv_134 for a while. I noticed when I do "ps -ef" or just "w" the OS panics. How can I examine the core? Thanks Yariv -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.

[osol-discuss] OpenSolaris Distributions

2010-04-19 Thread Ken Mays
OpenSolaris-based CD/DVD Distributions as of April 19, 2010: 1. OpenSolaris 2009.06 core reference 'tested' distro (snv_b111b kernel) 2. BeleniX (0.8 Beta 1, b114) 3. Nexenta Core Platform 3.0 (Beta 2, b134) 4. MilaX (b128a) 5. EON NAS appliance (b130) Somewhat defu

Re: [osol-discuss] snv_134 panics

2010-04-19 Thread Cyril Plisko
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 4:02 PM, Yariv Graf wrote: > Hi, > I'm working with snv_134 for a while. > I noticed when I do "ps -ef" or just "w" the OS panics. > How can I examine the core? 1. Enable collecting system dump (if it is not enabled yet) dumpadm -y 2. Examine /var/crash/$(hostname) - it

Re: [osol-discuss] snv_134 panics

2010-04-19 Thread Yariv Graf
Hi Cyril, /var/crash/opensolaris isn't created. I assume it will be created in the next crash, right? Thanks -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org

Re: [osol-discuss] OpenSolaris Distributions

2010-04-19 Thread Giovanni Tirloni
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 10:15 AM, Ken Mays wrote: > OpenSolaris-based CD/DVD Distributions as of April 19, 2010: > > 1. OpenSolaris 2009.06 core reference 'tested' distro (snv_b111b > kernel) > 2. BeleniX (0.8 Beta 1, b114) > 3. Nexenta Core Platform 3.0 (Beta 2, b134) > 4. Mi

Re: [osol-discuss] toshiba laptops opensolaris preinstalled

2010-04-19 Thread Bruce D Porter
On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 07:10:38 -0700, Edward Martinez wrote: > Hi, > > > were the Toshiba preinstalled OpenSolaris laptops discontinued? I was > planning about getting one later this year but now i can't find them > anymore. Just buy an M10, install OpenSolaris. Job's a good'un --

Re: [osol-discuss] snv_134 panics

2010-04-19 Thread Albert Lee
On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 06:33:39 PDT, Yariv Graf wrote: > Hi Cyril, > /var/crash/opensolaris isn't created. > I assume it will be created in the next crash, right? > > > Thanks You'll have to create the directory manually, then running savecore with no arguments will extract the current crash dump

[osol-discuss] Business use of OpenSolaris: enough to support commercial software?

2010-04-19 Thread Mike Kirk
Hi all, I work for Halcyon, and we've been selling monitoring software for Solaris (and other OS's) for many years. In general our Solaris 10 builds "just work" on OpenSolaris (no surprise there)... though we've never included official support for it in our main releases... or in our beta progr

Re: [osol-discuss] OpenSolaris Distributions

2010-04-19 Thread Erast
Also: NexentaStor Community Edition (3.0.0-1): http://www.nexentastor.org/ This is community driven, fully integrated Open Storage platform. Can be deployed everywhere, including enterprises, however, if one wants enterprise-level support and features, such as Synchronous Replication, High-A

Re: [osol-discuss] Business use of OpenSolaris: enough to support commercial software?

2010-04-19 Thread alan pae
> So as a general question: do you feel there's enough > business use of OpenSolaris for ISV's to start > targeting it for official support? Or will it always > be a waiting game for the next official version of > "Oracle Solaris" to get pushed out the door? Up until about now OpenSolaris has been

Re: [osol-discuss] When we install opensolaris 2009.6, does it layout a zfs file system?

2010-04-19 Thread Bart Smaalders
On 04/19/10 02:48, Shawn Walker wrote: On 04/18/10 06:16 AM, joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote: Albert Lee wrote: On Sun, 18 Apr 2010 03:01:48 +0430, Sarah kho wrote: hi,I am wondering what is the file system that opensolaris 2009.6 creates for its installation, is it zfs or ufs? th

Re: [osol-discuss] Asterisk

2010-04-19 Thread Mark Wright
Maybe persuading it that the release version is ok with dtrace might help: % cat ./sysrelease.d #!/usr/sbin/dtrace -Cws #include syscall::uname:entry { this->in = (struct utsname *)arg0; } syscall::uname:return { copyoutstr($$1, (uintptr_t)&this->in->release[0], SYS_NMLN);