On Tue, Dec 14, 2010, Loren Davis wrote:
> I'd take a closer look at the following lines in your Xorg log. Is your
> configuration correct? Do you have the right drivers installed?
It's a basic installation and I have not (yet) created an xorg.conf
file, i.e., X uses the builtin configuration:
On 12/14/2010 07:19 PM, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
>
> xterm doesn't use glx - you shouldn't get messages like that, but GLX
> acceleration isn't available for ATI graphics right now so it won't buy you
> much.
>
>
Thanks for the information.
>
> This message could be simply replaced by "Hey! Y
Loren Davis wrote:
> On 12/14/2010 06:22 PM, Claus Assmann wrote:
>
> I'd take a closer look at the following lines in your Xorg log. Is your
> configuration correct? Do you have the right drivers installed?
>
>> Xorg log follows:
>>
>
>> (II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions/amd64/
On 12/14/2010 06:22 PM, Claus Assmann wrote:
I'd take a closer look at the following lines in your Xorg log. Is your
configuration correct? Do you have the right drivers installed?
> Xorg log follows:
>
> (II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions/amd64/libglx.so
> dlopen: ld.so.1: Xorg:
On 12/15/10 03:22 PM, Claus Assmann wrote:
[Is it ok to ask questions about Solaris 11 Express here?]
I bought a new machine (with AMD 880G graphics chip) and while it
seems to run Solaris 11 Express (snv_151a) fine, it is very slow
under X. I ran some x11perf test which show good numbers, but
[Is it ok to ask questions about Solaris 11 Express here?]
I bought a new machine (with AMD 880G graphics chip) and while it
seems to run Solaris 11 Express (snv_151a) fine, it is very slow
under X. I ran some x11perf test which show good numbers, but the
thing that demonstrates the problem best i
> On 12/12/10 01:29 PM, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
>
>6769365 USB should power down during suspend
> WAG is while it isn't a suspend, the code executed in
> DDI_DETACH
> now powers down the device. The "interface"
> sub-device may
> get detached which may have an undesired side effect
> on the
>
On 12/12/10 01:29 PM, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
The mouse being reported as going online and offline several times a second
seems like the much bigger problem.
On 12/10/10 01:13 PM, user124 wrote:
My G9 work in 2009.06 from snv_111b to snv_117 normally, but from snv_118 till
nowadays builds i
