http://blogs.sun.com/albertw/entry/opensolaris_code_swarms
Cheers,
~Albert
--
Albert White - Sun Ireland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
for me.
Actually I don't bother with lockfs either. But I do add hot spares if I
have the disks spare.
I'd agree that its easy and reliable. Automate-able too.
Cheers,
~Al
--
Albert White - Patch System Test - Sun Ireland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.sun.com/albertw
. And the architecture then provides
for things like Live Upgrade, Zones and Diskless clients to work.
Having said all that I do think there is improvement needed in the tools.
Cheers,
~Al
[1] http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/817-5506/6mkv6ki6k?a=view
--
Albert White - Patch System Test - SUN
Martin 'MC' Brown wrote:
This is standard functionality in nearly all package-managed Linux
distributions, but the only way I know of for keeping up to date in
this way with Solaris is to pay for full support, and then AFAIK it is
limited to patches, rather than downloading and installing
case its something else to think about for a purely package based approach.
Cheers,
~Al
[1] yes you use patches to update packages and in that sense sun update
connection is managing packages. Thats probably what Chris meant, but
I'm clarifying it just in case!
--
Albert White - Patch System
level management system then thats great. But its a separate
discussion from whether to use the SVR4 package architecture.
Cheers,
~Al
--
Albert White - Patch System Test - SUN Ireland
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss
Hi,
http://blogs.sun.com/roller/page/albertw?entry=updaing
_software_in_the_open
Updaing?
ok ok so I didn't spellcheck the title! guilty.
To die up?
huh?
Btw, interesting comments there as well :-)
hmm... not very relavent are they. Deleted.
Thanks Dragan,
~Al
This message posted from
