> At installation with all default options, it not created second_root (default
> name) partition for me for upgrade of next release.
> I remembered that till release b74 or 85, as default it created second_root.
Not b85 for sure. I had to create that partition myself. But if you select ZFS
root
> I have installed zero patches on this box - should I install the Recommended
> Solaris Patch Clusters If yes which one?
> Solaris Express Community Edition snv_99 X86
There are *NO* patches for the operating system. There is a patch for
StarOffice8
and one for SUNWvts. Use "pca". http://www.
> The disks should should be hot swappable, no?
I've never tried a hotswap myself but a previous discussion may be of help:
http://opensolaris.org/jive/message.jspa?messageID=222069
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mai
>> devfsadm
> Okay, did that. Disk still does not show up...
If the disk does not appear when executing either "format" or "iostat -nE"
following
a devfsadm then the disk is either dead or has its data or power connector
disconnected.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
> I ran zpool online and zpool replace but could not get those to work. When I
> do
> a # format the re-inserted disk does not show up in the list.
As root execute "devfsadm".
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing
> after installing "opensolaris" i've found /home dir, but no way to change that
> permissons.
http://www.science.uva.nl/pub/solaris/solaris2/Q3.4.html
Note that the instructions are slightly out of date. If you want to refer to
/home/user_name
and continue to use the automounter then edit
> Can the cron jobs in the crontab be modified to run at different times?
crontab -e
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
> OOo 3.0.0rc4 is identical to the final release.
It's no use to me. I installed it Sunday on a fresh install of OpenSolaris
snv_98.
It crashed after I checked the no register box then Finish. There's no point in
trying to register when the registration site works only for Microsoft crapware.
R
> Can I simply install the x86 JDK from the SDLC or will I bugger up my pkg
> integrity on this machine?
I've been doing that since 1.6.0_07 was released. No noticeable problems.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ls -F /usr/jdk
instances/ jdk1.6.0_07@ latest@
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ head -1 /etc/release
> bbash-3.2# shutdown now
shutdown(1M) without any -i argument causes the sytem to go to single-user
state. "now" is just a message.
Try shutdown -y -g0 -i5 if you want to shutdown and power-off the machine.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
> They all work.
Provided that one avoids the executables in /usr/gnu/bin but that directory is
*first* in the default $PATH. GNU==GNU is Not UNIX
> At least they should all work in the latest OpenSolaris snv_98 Live
> CDROM/DVD image because the man page for standards(5) is the xact same as
> t
> IIRC the mac address reversal bug was fixed long ago.
Not! The bug exists in osol b98 still.
> A fixed version would not require the ifconfig ether hack.
Right.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensol
> Thanks, Juergen. I'll give that a try on my MCP61 and MCP67 systems. It would
> be
> nice to put those Intel NICs back into the parts box.
It surely did work. Thanks again!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ifconfig nge0
nge0: flags=201000843 mtu 1500 index 2
inet 192.168.0.5 netmask ff00 bro
> On one box (ASUS M2N-VM DVI) I had to workaround bug 6678904
> ( http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=6678904 ),
> by manually setting the MAC address:
Thanks, Juergen. I'll give that a try on my MCP61 and MCP67 systems. It would
be
nice to put those Intel NICs back into the parts b
> nge0: flags=201000843 mtu 1500 index 2
> inet 192.168.1.17 netmask ff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255
If that is the built-in Ethernet controller on an nVidia MCP chipset you are
*never*
going to make it work with either OpenSolaris or Solaris Express.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
> I didn't think I need support for all languages. Was that my mistake?
Not a mistake at all. You wrote:
>> I downloaded the snv_98 iso, burned it to DVD (it wouldn't fit on a CD),
and I merely showed that there does exist a CD-size image.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
> I downloaded the snv_98 iso, burned it to DVD (it wouldn't fit on a CD),
The osol-0811-98-global.iso is ~661 MB in size. I'm sure than any packages it
may be
missing can be added after installation.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
> Already did that. It helps a little but it's still unusable. Same goes for
> thunderbird. It's the
> whole window system that is malfunctioning. Switching between workspaces is a
> 5 second
> operation. Machine is Ferrari 4000 with 2GB and fresh install of 2008.11 b86
Then upgrade your system
Weigh that against Nexenta's spam posting to comp.unix.solaris.
Message ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
posted by:
Saqib Jang
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nexenta Systems, Inc.
from a Starbucks.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing
> how can i open this to edit it? i am su, but it only opens read only.
chmod u+w /etc/inet/services first.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
> I have downloaded os200805 twice 1 with SDM and 2
> with DAP.
Firefox is more reliable for such downloads than anything else you have access
to.
> I have burnt it using sonic record now 7.3
> and cd burner xp pro 4.2 in the iso image. I have
> done these several times and ruined a bunch of dis
> I tried mounting the usb drive with the mount_ntfs
> binary (http://sourceforge.net/projects/mount-ntfs/).
> Again same result...
Then the problem exists in the ntfs implementation or ntfs itself.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
openso
> I'm copying a file from a usb hdd (ntfs mounted read only with the FSWpart,
> FSWfsmisc installed)
> to my laptop's hdd, but I'm getting a "File too large" error:
> # ls -la laptopBackup_080821.bkf
> -r-xr-xr-x 1 root root 4294967295 Aug 21 22:45 laptopBackup_080821.bkf
Try using /usr/bin/cp,
23 matches
Mail list logo
