[osol-discuss] Re: Project Proposal -- Honeycomb Information and dev tools

2007-01-30 Thread Dean Roehrich
stephen lau wrote: >Why do you need to wait for agreement on the SDK before you >open source parts of Honeycomb? Are there legal issues? If there >aren't legal encumberances, then just publish the code. If there are, >then sort them out - and then come back and propose the project. I j

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: [osol-code] Announcement: Codereview Hosting now Available

2005-10-20 Thread Dean Roehrich
On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 04:44:19PM +0200, Casper H.S. Dik wrote: > "codereview", the tool, generates a postscript file with all modified > files and the changes (insertions, deletion) in context. This is > generally much more readable than unified diffs, specifically when we're > talking about

[osol-discuss] Re: [osol-code] Announcement: Codereview Hosting now Available

2005-10-20 Thread Dean Roehrich
On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 03:40:17PM -0700, Dan Price wrote: > > Hi Everyone, > > Codereview is a pillar of quality software development; the OpenSolaris > project does a good job of intensively reviewing changes today, but our > codereview process would would be even better if more codereviews > i