There is/was no PostgreSQL, Inc. to buy out that owned the code rights,
so there's no comparison to buying MySQL
Oh.. now i see why its not popular .. even if its better..
thats another proof that popular does'nt necessarily means good..
and theres a lot of examples around...
On Mon, Oct 11,
Ok, now that make sense :)
i think, the secret to know how they think.. is to look through the optics
of profit and market.. thats very different from sun, wich posess a hibrid
view, between technology and market.. sort like google do..
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 11:45 AM, Octave Orgeron
dream, dream, dream, dream ...
x86 is comming, and is taking large server share( and linux with it ), and
the only Risc is growing up, is ARM because of the mobile market boom...
Solaris will be another AIX, because is that what the company who owns it
now, want it to become.. another
Solar
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 6:46 AM, Bruce Porter b...@ytc1.co.uk wrote:
Stellaris ?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
or even Sol wich in portuguese (and spanish) means sun
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Fabio Kaminski fabiokamin...@gmail.comwrote:
Solar
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 6:46 AM, Bruce Porter b...@ytc1.co.uk wrote:
Stellaris ?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
unfortunately Oracle is very profit guided, so i think they dont botter at
all with the competition of OS's for the server market
since they have linux and solaris now... they will make profit anyway.. they
just dont care about technology, or create something unique anymore..
they trade their
it will take a long time til oracle can digest an animal like sun... linux
is pretty much in oracle DNA.. maybe the silence about osol is about to kill
or disperse de community formed around it...
i dont think a smart company like oracle would consciouslly forget a project
like this..
i think is