On Sep 2, 2010, at 4:07 AM, Joerg Schilling wrote:
>>
> I am not sure what you expect.
Less cloak & dagger bullshit. Either you're working on an _open_ source project
or you're working on a top secret, fully buzzword compliant project that may or
may not be based on Illumos, Solaris, SunOS, BS
On Sep 5, 2010, at 11:15 AM, John Thompson wrote:
> Anything else I can do?
Yes, you could compile & install from source;
http://www.torproject.org/download-unix.html.en
-Gary
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On Sep 6, 2010, at 6:36 AM, David Blake wrote:
> is anyone planning an alternative to Illumos or a fork?
What exactly are you looking for? A fully baked distribution based on Illumos?
Have you read through the FAQ, looked at Schillix, NexentaCore, etc? If there's
something important missing fro
On Sep 7, 2010, at 1:42 PM, Edward Martinez quoted:
> Thanks to its strong support of the x86 hardware architecture, "in terms of
> overall volume, Linux is just a much higher volume product than Solaris ever
> was," says Al Gillen, an IDC analyst.
Volume of licenses tells us nothing about the k
On Sep 9, 2010, Mike Riley wrote:
> I set it up as a 64-bit Open Solaris environment.
Do you get the same error when trying to boot on a 32-bit VM?
-Gary
>
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On Sep 11, 2010, at 6:59 AM, Kyle McDonald wrote:
>>
> They make it sound like they feel threatened by OpenSource software, the GPL
> in particular. While I have no love for the GPL, I've never thought that any
> OSS license would create the need for language like that.
It's probably much less
On Sep 11, 2010, at 9:09 AM, Cia Watson wrote:
> I have one question at the moment: Will there be ext3 and/or ext4 support? I
> have a shared data partition in ext3 that I would need to be able to mount
> periodically.
There is already a read only filesystem package that allows mounting of NTF
On Sep 18, 2010, at 5:46 PM, valrhona wrote:
> Also, is there a way just to put the command into the Nexenta gui?
Are you using Nexenta core or Nexentastor? If the latter, you might find this
more helpful but some info is equally applicable to any ZFS native NFS sharing:
http://www.nexenta.com/
On Sep 21, 2010, at 8:37 PM, Edward Martinez wrote:
> Well...Solaris 11 express support for production use will be made available
> under the Oracle Premier Support for Operating Systems program, maybe those
> who are enrolled will have access to the source code. maybe not.
For awhile, some MySQ
On Sep 22, 2010, at 12:57 AM, Knut Reinert wrote:
> Given the ongoing BSD'tification of Illumos userland utilities I'd say
> it may be time to fork. Solaris and it's descendants should stay with
> it's SystemV heritage and POSIX.
How do BSD or System V have anything to do with POSIX or Single UNIX
On Sep 22, 2010, at 1:24 AM, "Dmitry G. Kozhinov" wrote:
> Can Illumos developers spend 20 million person hours of development?
There's much to be said for quality versus quantity. ;)
-Gary
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@openso
On Sep 22, 2010, at 5:02 AM, Cedric Blancher wrote:
> This is news for me. Could you point me to the opengroup page which
> lists FreeBSD, NetBSD or any other BSD operating system except Apple
> OS X as SUS certified?
Apple is the only one that can afford to pay for it but that means Darwin is as
On Sep 26, 2010, at 2:31 AM, Orvar Korvar wrote:
> As IBM has officially stated that they are going to phase out AIX in favour
> of Linux, it probably makes sense to sell off POWER.
It's been seven years since they said they were going to discontinue AIX.
Regardless, I find it highly unlikely t
On Sep 30, 2010, at 6:50 PM, "W. Wayne Liauh" wrote:
> Further discussions on this subject will be moved to the Taiwan OpenSolaris
> Users Group.
Speaking of which, who wants to pitch a Solaris port of Lotus Symphony Suite to
IBM? It's developed in Beijing...
-Gary
Are you running windows locally or across NFS? If the latter, be sure to use
GigE interfaces and switch. Also, if you want a home NAS box consider
NexentaStor's community edition that's free for up to 12 Tb of storage.
-Gary
___
opensolaris-discuss mai
On Oct 12, 2010, at 7:26 PM, JV711 wrote:
> I'm no expert in the cloud space, but last time I looked, joyent.com was
> opensolaris-based. Perhaps you could try them.
If I understand their documentation correctly, they also maintain their own
package repositories and security patches. Their pric
On Nov 21, 2010, at 1:42 AM, carlopmart wrote:
> Sorry for not clarify the issue of support. With support I meant to install
> patches and upgrades between releases, not a commercial support.
Yes but the community edition tops out at 12 terabytes so that should be
sufficient for most home uses.
You didn't specify SATA or SAS (or speed if the latter) and what kind of
external connector (SAS or eSATA). I've built my chassis for Nexentastor with
LSI HBAs and Promise chassis with mini SAS connectors (SFF-8088) and both 6G/s
3.5" SAS drives & SATA drives. But they only have rack-mount in 8
I'd recommend something like the HP Proliant Microserver that holds four
drives. 8Gb RAM should be sufficient for your needs since you aren't using
deduplication or if you are it's not likely to be an issue for the size of your
pools.
-Gary
___
openso
On Feb 21, 2011, at 6:56 AM, Orvar Korvar wrote:
> Intel Sandybridge, does it support ECC?
Yes but not in every processor...
http://embedded.communities.intel.com/community/en/rovingreporter/blog/2010/12/14/roving-reporter-sandy-bridge-features-will-match-embedded-application-requirements
On Feb 22, 2011 Orvar Korvar wrote:
> This means I have to buy a Xeon grade Sandy Bridge, which sucks. I would
> prefer a cheap i5/whatever.
Actually, the mobile core i5-2515E & i7-2715QE will allegedly include ECC RAM
support so don't be surprised if some desktop class CPUs will also.
-Gary
__
On Feb 22, 2011, at 7:43 AM, Erik Trimble wrote:
> On 2/22/2011 6:00 AM, Gary Driggs wrote:
>> On Feb 22, 2011 Orvar Korvar wrote:
>>> This means I have to buy a Xeon grade Sandy Bridge, which sucks. I would
>>> prefer a cheap i5/whatever.
>> Actually, the mobi
Dual core Atom systems make for quite usable desktops -- even when playing
video. Here's a Shuttle PC nettop with 40W power supply that I have in my home
office with MeeGo Linux and is ready to use in 30 seconds from a full power on;
http://us.shuttle.com/X350.aspx
I haven't had a chance to try
Perhaps it was "do not use OpenIndiana in a production environment?"
-Gary
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
FWIW, they list Linux and Mac clients as not supported as well...
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On Mar 27, 2011, at 9:31 AM, "Darko Hojnik" wrote:
> They is no Bridge on the System configured. ... And everything should run in
> one network only without bridging.
In that case, your global zone will need to act as a NAT/routing device and all
your VNICs will be able to see each other but th
26 matches
Mail list logo
