This reminds me of the question:
Is Red Hat's RHEL 4.1 the same as CentOS 4.1?
The answer is 'yes'.
Are both the same as Fedora Core?
The answer is no. However, Fedora Core is a distro of
Red Hat just as Schillix is a distro of Open Solaris.
Is OpenSolaris then the same as Solaris, as CentOS is
How to measure openness? What about like "look, but
no touch! Or if you must touch, go ahead ... NO, NOT
THERE!! :-)
> > > guess is probably not, given that I think we are
> > > talking about OpenSolaris and not Solaris.
> Kinda
> > begs
> > > an important question: how open is OpenSolaris?
>
I'm wondering if this a statement of one individual or
if it represents a group eg. CAB, Sun, or whoever. My
guess is probably not, given that I think we are
talking about OpenSolaris and not Solaris. Kinda begs
an important question: how open is OpenSolaris?
Thanks.
> On Mon, 11 Jul 2005, Sun
I agree. But if the intent is to grow the user base,
I'm guessing that newbies and Linux users would
probably rather get annoyed now instead of later.
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >"Do you want to install a command line prompt or
> shell
> >that is backwardly compatible to legacy Solaris or
ing the same types of discussions
continuing on to other distros. Having options is one
thing, but making sure people know that there are
options which are easily opted for early on is
probably another matter altogether.
--- Jim Grisanzio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> George Jereza wrot
This is a good email thread for new Solaris users,
especially for those who are considering moving from
Linux. I'm hoping the community is cutting n' pasting
the main points in this thread and publishing it
somewhere, so that the group can move on to other
issues. Otherwise, it'll come up again,
