networked i7 running Win 7.
Note that Oracle will remove support for x86 32-bit soon, so
the next Solaris Express or Solaris 11 release will likely not
run on that box. You might want to consider switching to an
alternative such as OpenIndiana.
--
Guido Berhoerster
releases
based on Illumos, this has been our goal from the beginning.
--
Guido Berhoerster
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
in order to get the 2.9.1 Intel driver
(the last version supporting UMS) to build with the 1.8.0 Xorg
server. It works just fine.
--
Guido Berhoerster
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
officially buried and one has to buy a support contract
to have stable _and_ secure system?
--
Guido Berhoerster
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Will the 2009.06 /release-branch in contrast to 2008.05 and 2008.11
finally be maintained in terms of security/driver fixes?
The release notes talk about the next release being in 2010, will there
be no 2009.11 release?
Thanks,
--
Guido Berhoerster
Shawn Walker wrote:
I'm just going to have to disagree in general.
Maintaining software is expensive, especially lots of software.
Your belief seems to be that Sun should support the cost of the
distribution by themselves, that if the community doesn't provide it,
Sun has to, and that you
Shawn Walker wrote:
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 5:51 AM, Simon Breden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My understanding from what I've seen is that SXCE is a release made
approximately every 2 weeks, and is based on the Nevada project.
Again, my understanding of the 2008.05 release is that:
1. this will
Shawn Walker wrote:
*If* that is what Sun chooses to do, it would essentially be the same
thing RedHat does with Fedora, and I think it would be quite fair.
I suspect we'll find out more on May 13th.
That would be a major disappointment to me, as I had hoped more from
a community effort.
Shawn Walker wrote:
No, CentOS only exists because RedHat was extremely restrictive about
any usage of their trademark. The CentOS folks weren't even allowed to
reference the fact that their packages came from RedHat Enterprise
Linux.
The other difference is that, thanks to ips, it is
Shawn Walker wrote:
As such, should there be no security fixes only repository provided
by Sun, community members can certainly provide one and users can
simply add that to their configuration.
That was all I meant.
Debian and Fedora both rely upon community members to supply most of
their
10 matches
Mail list logo
