On 6/25/07, Alan Coopersmith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
And what would we do with that? (Really - I'm coming from
a background of the X.Org Foundation, which is having a hard
time finding ways to spend it's cash - it's not enough to hire
a stable of full-time developers, so has avoided paying f
On 6/25/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I would be very much in favour of seeing OpenSolaris become a
501(c)(3) entity. In fact, I think it is essential that OpenSoalris
does so, otherwise OpenSolaris is not exactly attractive for
people/companies to donate anything towards in t
On 1/16/07, Jim Grisanzio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
However, it's well known that Sun has been involved in GPL v3
conversations all long, Java and OpenSPARC went out GPL v2, and
GlassFish is GPLv2/CDDL. So if the company is actually considering v3 as
an addition to CDDL for OpenSolaris, why not?
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 04:17:02AM +0100, Robert Milkowski wrote:
> However, after quick glance at documentation, it looks like
> combination webdav + authtype digest + ldap is not supported.
>
> This is bad :(
Oh, yah. The problem is that you can't really have LDAP handle digest as
the passwor
On 1/10/07, Robert Milkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
With such configure (openldap) it works fine
bash-3.00# ./configure --prefix=/opt/apache2.0.59 --enable-layout=Apache
--enable-mods-shared=all --enable-suexec --enable-ssl --with-ssl=/usr/sfw
--with-mpm=prefork --enable-headers --enable-da
On 1/10/07, Robert Milkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
JE> Subversion serves just fine to Windows boxes from Solaris. Adding
JE> LDAP authentication is fairly trivial (once it compiles). What's the
JE> problem? -- justin
subersion? I lost you.
Subversion uses mod_dav too, so it's essential
On 1/10/07, Robert Milkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
According to documentation it should.
But I didn't manage to compile it on snv_54.
I installed openldap from Blastwave and compiled against it - worked
perfectly.
I don't have a snv_54 build locally, but if you can provide the
compilation
On 1/9/07, Darren J Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Off the top of my head one problem area that might be present here is
with LDAP library needs to be used, does this stuff work with the
Mozilla LDAP library - which is basically what libldap.so.5 in the ON
consolidation is - or does it depend
On 5/4/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've been subscribed to many lists without subject tags.
Oh, I hate subject tags too. But, the problem is that once the list
is created, it's not appropriate to remove the tags. Those types of
decisions should have been made when the lis
On 5/2/06, Darren Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
FWIW, both FreeBSD and NetBSD currently use CVS for their projects and
while there are "known issues" with CVS, so far evaluations of other
tools (ie. SVN) have failed to produce compelling reasons to switch.
Almost all FreeBSD developers use th
On 5/2/06, Darren Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As one of those who dissented from the change, I think it's a great idea
to offer the subscribing user choice here.
I had a brief write-up that detailed how to generally do this - but
removed it before I posted my last message - but since others
On 5/2/06, Stephen Hahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I would very much like to eliminate the second and subsequent list
name inclusions from subject lines. Are there a substantial number of
people filtering on anything other than the first included list name?
(And have done so in an order-
On 4/9/06, Roland Mainz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
BTW: When subversion will become a part of Solaris I'd like to propose a
project which looks at some platform-specific optimisations for
subversion, including some hacks to libsvn_wc (the code which handles
the subversion working copy) to make it
On 5/1/06, Darren Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The best thing a list can do is to stick with whatever choice
it makes when it is first created, for better or worse. The
worst you can do is to decide to change the behaviour at
some point in the future.
+1. -- justin
On 4/20/06, Jim Grisanzio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks, Justin. My understanding is that Simon Phipps has applied for
> Sun's projects and that he's been interacting with Google. I've cc'd him
> here.
The right folks on Google's end are looking into this.
Thanks! -- justin
___
On 4/20/06, Jim Grisanzio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Great ideas for OpenSolaris participation in the Google Summer of Code,
> guys. The list of participating organizations at Google's site is
> growing, but so far OpenSolaris is not approved yet. I think we need one
> page to list all these proj
On 4/18/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >A name is just a name; we could change it to something less hidden like
> >techlib. There are so many projects with codenames already, are we just
> >fighting the tide?
>
> I have raised the objections elsewhere also.
>
> Perhaps we shou
On 4/7/06, Stephen Hahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One of the upcoming submissions for the freeware consolidation will be
> to ensure that Subversion and Mercurial are available in one or more
> of the standard installation scenarios.
Cool! -- justin
__
18 matches
Mail list logo
