Re: [osol-discuss] GCC 4.4: Can we handle it?!?

2009-06-15 Thread Marc Glisse
Upgrading GCCfss to 4.4.0 is included in our plans. Hello, I am definitely not a lawyer, but it seems to me that the new GCC runtime library exception adopted in gcc-4.4 was written specifically so that things like gccfss are forbidden unless you opensource the backend with an appropriate

Re: [osol-discuss] GCC 4.4: Can we handle it?!?

2009-06-14 Thread Marc Glisse
Hopefully, this will spark the GCCfss resources to update to GCCfss 4.4.0 as well (see: http://cooltools.sunsource.net/gcc). For gccfss and gcc-4.4, there may be legal reasons preventing the mix, so don't hold your breath. Btw, I still believe that in opensolaris we should not consider

[osol-discuss] Re: Re: Refined OpenSolaris KDE proposal / Re: Proposal to create an Open

2007-01-18 Thread Marc Glisse
On 1/18/07, Joerg Schilling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 6. The distribution should be compiled with the Sun Studio compilers (as a mandatory requirement for the project). No gcc junk. Or be compatible with both, like the solaris core? (and let the distros choose which ABI they prefer)

[osol-discuss] Re: Refined OpenSolaris KDE proposal / Re: Proposal to create an OpenSola

2007-01-17 Thread Marc Glisse
1. Deliver KDE3 to /usr/kde3/ and reserve /usr/kde4/ for KDE version 4. Does it really make sense to spend much time on kde3 at this point? Copying the stuff that is already on solaris.kde.org is ok, but there probably should not be much more. I think it makes more sense to collaborate as