by external persons are only taken if they please Sun
--
// Martin Schaffstall
//EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\\ //
\X/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On 8/24/06, James Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martin Schaffstall writes:
It is interesting to observe that each time the project reaches
another milestone a Sun employee steps in and demands a full change of
the project.
Very suspicious.
Good grief! Would it be at all possible
are anxious to get ksh93 integrated,
but doing it right involves some time.
Why isn't it possible to upload the current version to Opensolaris and
do further fine tuning later? The project seems to be a in a good
shape and EVERYONE is complaining about the delays
--
// Martin Schaffstall
by the week of Aug 7th.
Today its Aug 8th. Do you have any problems?
--
// Martin Schaffstall
//EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\\ //
\X/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
--
Formal Proposal : Port OpenSolaris to PowerPC
+1
I suggest to make /bin/ksh ksh93 from the beginning that you don't
have to deal with any backwards compatibility fuzz later
--
// Martin Schaffstall
//EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\\ //
\X
:(
--
// Martin Schaffstall
//EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\\ //
\X/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
into the Solaris tree? This is a task which should be
finished within weeks and NOT years.
--
// Martin Schaffstall
//EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\\ //
\X/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On 7/27/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[1] Well, considering that /bin/ksh is for some reason not part of the
Unix license we once bought and therefor in usr/closed
You're not going to file a bug to get the old /bin/ksh open sourced, do you?
--
// Martin Schaffstall
On 7/27/06, Raquel Velasco and Bill Buck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
great!
Lets hope we won't see an open sourced version of the old /bin/ksh
--
// Martin Schaffstall
//EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\\ //
\X/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing
and other have wanted ksh93 in Solaris
for a long time, provided it is done properly.
Somehow I can't really believe that. Currently I associate Casper
Disk with the term ksh93 hater because each time we have this topic
Casper Disk sends another hate mail
--
// Martin Schaffstall
On 7/27/06, James Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martin Schaffstall writes:
On 7/27/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PS: Somehow I have the feeling that Sun doesn't want to see the
project succeed in replacing ksh88 with ksh93, a feeling which is
based on the open
I just had an idea: Would it be useful/feasible to sign all
executabley in Solaris with a cryptographic key and only allow
execution of signed binaries then? Would this help to improve system
security?
--
// Martin Schaffstall
//EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\\ //
\X
an estimation when we can expect this to happen?
--
// Martin Schaffstall
//EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\\ //
\X/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
? ;-)
Joking aside, I agree that mailing list names should be somewhat guessable
by those not in the know.
Obvious choice would be SKML, the Solaris Kernel Mailing List.
--
// Martin Schaffstall
//EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\\ //
\X
On 4/18/06, Bart Smaalders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martin Schaffstall wrote:
Obvious choice would be SKML, the Solaris Kernel Mailing List.
That works, and seems somehow familiar.
We've always (well, for the 17+ years I've been here) had
a kernel mailing list. We could put your idea
15 matches
Mail list logo
