Re: [osol-discuss] ZOTAC IONITX-A-U Atom N330 1.6GHz Dual-Core Mini ITX Intel Motherboard

2009-06-25 Thread Oliver Feilner
Hello, I got the reply from Zotac. | Dear Sir, | | We are sorry to tell you that the IONITX system target is Windows XP / Vista. | There is no test for the OpenSolaris system. Therefore, we are unable to | predict the result on the OpenSolaris. | B.rgds | One question: The bug re

Re: [osol-discuss] ZOTAC IONITX-A-U Atom N330 1.6GHz Dual-Core Mini ITX Intel Motherboard

2009-06-23 Thread Oliver Feilner
I’m also quite interested on the board. The NIC chipset is RTL8211CL which should be supported in some SVN version when my interpretation the bug report http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6768362 is correctly. Otherwise I have seen that there are some display drives provi

[osol-discuss] SOLVED: Lousy ZFS performance on D945GSEJT

2009-06-23 Thread Oliver Feilner
Hello, finally I solved all issues and received the following performance values between a CIFS share on OpenSolaris and Windows Vista: Write Vista to OpenSolaris: 35,6 MByte/s Read Vistra from OpenSolaris: 34,5 MByte/s I made the measurement with a 2048 MByte and the H2testw tool. (http://www.

Re: [osol-discuss] Lousy ZFS performance on D945GSEJT

2009-06-21 Thread Oliver Feilner
Hello, thanks for the tip with the power management. First I switched of powermanagement witin the BIOS without having any effect. Then I I played arround with the power.conf and managed to get 34 MByte/s in both directions. Now I have to figure out which parameter made the effect without turn

Re: [osol-discuss] Lousy ZFS performance on D945GSEJT

2009-06-21 Thread Oliver Feilner
> Are you using Samba on Solaris > (svc:/network/samba:default)? > Or the svc:/network/smb/server:default ? I'm using the SW packages SUNWsmbs and SUNWsmbkskr which should reffer to svc:/network/smb/server:default > Maybe you could share a directory on /tmp > with samba; that would use the ramd

Re: [osol-discuss] Lousy ZFS performance on D945GSEJT

2009-06-20 Thread Oliver Feilner
> > and Samba or CIFS is performing well also > > Why? Did you do some measurements to prove this? > > Are you saying this because "Vista -- FreeBSD (Samba > / UFS)" > was able to transfer 30 - 40 Mb/sec? Yes because Vista -- FreeBSD UFS and Vista -- Unbuntu Ext3 head well performance while V

Re: [osol-discuss] Lousy ZFS performance on D945GSEJT

2009-06-18 Thread Oliver Feilner
Hello, I made some dd measurements this time I tried Ubuntu as reference with ext3 and zfs-fuse to judge on the OpenSolaris figures. Please note that I ensured that the zfs-cache is empty before trying to read. As you can see from the figures they are amazingly good. So ZFS is not the bottlenec

Re: [osol-discuss] Lousy ZFS performance on D945GSEJT

2009-06-18 Thread Oliver Feilner
Hello, thanks for your fast answer. > I hope you didn't enable compression on your > zfs filesystems... No I didn't made that fault. > Is the S-ATA controller in the ICH7 set to AHCI or > to legacy P-ATA mode? That is, does Solaris use the > "ahci" or the "pci-ide" driver? The value Osol <> V

[osol-discuss] Lousy ZFS performance on D945GSEJT

2009-06-17 Thread Oliver Feilner
Lousy ZFS performance on D945GSEJT Hello, I have installed OpenSolaris 2009/06 on D945GSEJT see [1]: - Intel Atom CPU N270 1.6Ghz (32Bit) - Intel Mobile 945GSE Express Chipset - Intel 82945GSE Graphics and Memory Controller Hub (GMCH) - Intel 82801GBM I/O Controller Hub (ICH7-M) - Realtek 8111DL