On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 06:58:24PM -0700, Jake Hamby wrote:
> I just did a quick performance test of bsdtar vs. gnutar, star, and Solaris
> tar in extracting a large (704MB uncompressed) .tar.bz2 archive:
>
> $ time gtar -xjf ~/Downloads/kde/KDEkderequired-341.tar.bz2
>
> $ bzcat ~/Downloads/kde
On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 11:31:12AM -0700, John Plocher wrote:
> Is it important (as an architectural goal...) that we could say
> "runs on OpenSolaris[1]"
> in the face of multiple "OpenSolaris based" distros?
There is some mention of this at
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/about/faq/trademark
On Sat, Jul 09, 2005 at 09:51:17PM -0700, Sunil wrote:
> # roleadd -u 0 -o -g 0 -G 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,12 -d / -s /bin/pfksh
^^^
There's your problem - you can't have a role and a user with the same UID.
If you want to make root a role, then follow the (trivial) procedure for
doin
On Sat, Jul 09, 2005 at 08:37:57PM -0500, Shawn Walker wrote:
> I would say you've found a bug then. Since the roles manpage claims
Or far more likely he's done something wrong in configuring the role.
# uname -a
SunOS f3800a 5.9 Generic_117171-07 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire
# roleadd -d /home/role
On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 11:41:40PM -0700, Sunil wrote:
> if I were to ask my question again, it would be:
>
> is there a version of 'su' or equivalent piece of software which uses rsa/dsa
> keys to authenticate locally, instead of password? I don't want to have sshd
> running for this because it
On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 05:33:46PM +0800, James Lick wrote:
> The only Sun
> provided distribution of OpenSolaris comes only as source code (and a
> bunch of binaries that are still closed source). You need to Solaris
Not so. There is a binary "distribution" in the form of BFU archives.
These
