Re: [osol-discuss] [illumos-Developer] zpool upgrade and zfs upgrade behavior on b145

2010-09-29 Thread Chris Mosetick
Hi Cindy, I did see your first email pointing to that bughttp://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6538600. Apologies for not addressing it earlier. It is my opinion that the behavior Mike, and I http://illumos.org/issues/217 (or anyone else upgrading pools right now) is seeing

Re: [osol-discuss] [illumos-Developer] zpool upgrade and zfs upgrade behavior on b145

2010-09-29 Thread Casper . Dik
Additionally, even though zpool and zfs get version display the true and updated versions, I'm not convinced that the problem is zdb, as the label config is almost certainly set by the zpool and/or zfs commands. Somewhere, something is not happening that is supposed to when initiating a zpool

Re: [osol-discuss] [illumos-Developer] zpool upgrade and zfs upgrade behavior on b145

2010-09-29 Thread Chris Mosetick
Well strangely enough, I just logged into a OS b145 machine. It's rpool is not mirrored, just a single disk. I know that zdb reported zpool version 22 after at least the first 3 reboots after rpool upgrade, so I stopped checking. zdb now reports version 27. This machine has probably been

Re: [osol-discuss] [illumos-Developer] zpool upgrade and zfs upgrade behavior on b145

2010-09-28 Thread Cindy Swearingen
Hi Chris, I think you are running into this bug: http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6538600 pool version is not updated in the label config after zpool upgrade and before reboot Exporting and importing the pool or a reboot seems to clear it up. Thanks, Cindy On

Re: [osol-discuss] [illumos-Developer] zpool upgrade and zfs upgrade behavior on b145

2010-09-27 Thread Chris Mosetick
The strange behavior that I witnessed on the machine that had its hostname renamed was never resolved or investigated further. Luckily it was a experiment/test machine. About the zpool headers not getting updated after a zpool upgrade? I filled a bug on the Illumos bug tracker: