Sounds like a good charter. Gets my vote (even though I'm not on the
advisory board).
Obligatory disclaimer: I am an IBM contractor, and am a fan of IBM POWER,
MIPS and SPARC architectures.
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 9:20 AM, Mark Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 6:12 P
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 6:12 PM, William Kucharski <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So if there is sufficient interest in a MIPS project, I would be happy to
> get the ball rolling by formally proposing the creation of such a project
> under the Emerging Platforms CG.
I thought we had enough votes
+1
On 10/24/08, William Kucharski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So if there is sufficient interest in a MIPS project, I would be happy to
> get
> the ball rolling by formally proposing the creation of such a project under
> the
> Emerging Platforms CG.
>
> I'd just need to know the charter and who
So if there is sufficient interest in a MIPS project, I would be happy to get
the ball rolling by formally proposing the creation of such a project under the
Emerging Platforms CG.
I'd just need to know the charter and who wants to be the project leads.
William Kucharski
__
"Mark Martin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not a bad idea, but challenging due to the max memory sizes on the Qubes. I
> also wonder how much information and support we will get for those older
> platforms. I think if there is any chance of running on running on any
> platform with less than 512
