On 10/30/07, Isaac R. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Brandorr wrote:
>
> >At the heart of it is the questions, "Should the OpenSolaris
> >brand/trademark refer to a runnable OS?", and "If, so, do we limit to
> >distros that are binary copies of the Indiana distro?"
> >
>
> I think we need to define a
Brandorr wrote:
>At the heart of it is the questions, "Should the OpenSolaris
>brand/trademark refer to a runnable OS?", and "If, so, do we limit to
>distros that are binary copies of the Indiana distro?"
>
>
>
I think we need to define a difference between what constitutes an
'operating syste
