To: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Sent: Wed, November 18, 2009 11:38:57 PM
Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] [xwin-discuss] Sun UltraSparc: XVR-500, Expert 3D,
legacy graphic cards
Although I respond to Alan appraently it didn't get posted here. I am comparing
a cluster of Sun Blade 2000&
Although I respond to Alan appraently it didn't get posted here. I am comparing
a cluster of Sun Blade 2000's with a cluster of Ultra-24's Even though the
clock speed of the Ultra-24 is nearly 3 times that of the Blade 2000 the run
times for WRF-DA are nearly the same (< 5% difference). Since I
Dr. Robert Pasken wrote:
> Actually I think there are quite a few of us sparc users who would rather not
> give up performance and reliability for the really lackluster performance and
> problems associated with Solaris-X86 and intel in general
For desktop usage, I can't imagine you can get any
Dr. Robert Pasken wrote:
Actually I think there are quite a few of us sparc users who would rather not
give up performance and reliability for the really lackluster performance and
problems associated with Solaris-X86 and intel in general
Can you detail the performance issues and problems o
Actually I think there are quite a few of us sparc users who would rather not
give up performance and reliability for the really lackluster performance and
problems associated with Solaris-X86 and intel in general
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
__
--- On Thu, 11/5/09, Martin Bochnig wrote:
> From: Martin Bochnig
> Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] [xwin-discuss] Sun UltraSparc: XVR-500, Expert
> 3D, legacy graphic cards
> To: "Alan Coopersmith"
> Cc: "OpenSolaris X Window System List" ,
> opensolari
