I really don't think there will be any need to fork. If anything, people moving
around who're still committed to the technology is a very good thing.
OpenSolaris is healthy. The code is healthy too. And so is the rather nice
CDDL, which I prefer over GNU's hideous template stamp.
They're
Roger Bisson wrote:
James,
All OS platforms benefit from the network effects of wide usage.
I agree, but 'free as in beer' helps here more than 'free as in source'.
To the average developer, Solaris (which, in a closed model, you would have to
pay for)
I think you are confusing 'free
Don't apologize if you feel or think a certain way. Just because most on here
believe you can only have an opinion that matches theirs, doesn't mean you
can't offer up your own.
I've said it before, that I personally don't know why Oracle would spend
millions developing Solaris 10 and spend
On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 3:26 PM, bsd mascotgr...@yahoo.com wrote:
I've said it before, that I personally don't know why Oracle would spend
millions developing Solaris 10 and spend millions developing OpenSolaris when
OpenSolaris isn't a revenue generator. I don't buy into it's the
I've said it before, that I personally don't know why
Oracle would spend millions developing Solaris 10 and
spend millions developing OpenSolaris when
OpenSolaris isn't a revenue generator. I don't buy
into it's the development model line either. Funny
that I never heard it was the
Roger Bisson wrote:
Personally, I am of the view that Sun's original decision to release Solaris in
the form of OpenSolaris was absolutely the right decision to ensure Solaris'
maintenance and growth as a platform by making it available to developers and
technicians (thereby encouraging its
James,
Personally, I am of the view that Sun's original
decision to release Solaris in the form of
OpenSolaris was absolutely the right decision to
ensure Solaris' maintenance and growth as a platform
by making it available to developers and technicians
(thereby encouraging its application
aggg, I don't like the thought of Garrett
D'Amore and ZFS co- creator Bill Moore deflecting to
Nexenta,other opensoalris originators may follow.
IMO nexenta by hiring some former opensolaris
devs. is preparing themselves to continue developing
the opensolaris kernel on their own
Edward Martinez wrote:
http://www.itnews.com.au/News/174797,ellison-scorns-schwartzs-leadership-of-sun.aspx
I have to wonder which projects are not commercialiable and seen as science
projects and will be ignored?
I don't know which ones he's speaking of specifically, but I'd have
to guess
Edward Martinez wrote:
http://www.itnews.com.au/News/174797,ellison-scorns-sc
hwartzs-leadership-of-sun.aspx
I have to wonder which projects are not
commercialiable and seen as science projects and
will be ignored?
I don't know which ones he's speaking of
specifically, but I'd have
What cyber university/professional training class has it on something other
than Sun/Oracle hardware ? All I meant earlier is that sometimes your current
job is better than starting over. Of course I never had standing offers to move.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
I was wondering with D'Amore jumping over to
Nexenta. if the time comes to take drastic
measures, if they are willing and have the
resources, can something be organized with nexenta
to become the fork?
I want to apologize for this thread and for any displease it might of caused,
i
On 12 May 2010, at 07:34, Edward Martinez wrote:
Are you saying that nexenta contribute code to
the opensolaris project? if they do, then i should
not really be concern about BIll Moore and Garrett
D'Amore joining Nexenta then. their work will still
be within the opensolaris
[...]
aggg, I don't like the thought of Garrett
D'Amore and ZFS co- creator Bill Moore deflecting to
Nexenta,other opensoalris originators may follow.
IMOnexenta by hiring some former opensolaris
devs. is preparing themselves to continue developing
the opensolaris kernel on their
On the business side of this its still a senior member getting the bump for a
possible cheaper younger job fill. Which is sad to me being of age for the ax.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
On the business side of this; its still a senior
member getting the bump for a possible cheaper
younger job fill. Which is sad to me being of age for
the ax.
You're making an assumption that is not supported by
evidence I'm aware of.
If there are two parties to a relationship, and the
aggg, I don't like the thought of Garrett D'Amore and ZFS co- creator
Bill Moore deflecting to Nexenta,other opensoalris originators may follow.
IMO nexenta by hiring some former opensolaris devs. is preparing
themselves to continue developing the opensolaris kernel on their own
On 05/14/10 12:47 PM, john kroll wrote:
On the business side of this its still a senior member getting the bump for a
possible cheaper younger job fill. Which is sad to me being of age for the ax.
evidence of your claim?
___
opensolaris-discuss
On 11 May 2010, at 17:55, Edward Martinez wrote:
I'm sorry, with these kind if news i get concern
and once i get concern lot of ideas start flowing in
my head on how i can help out.
Concerned about what? That somebody who was actively
working on OpenSolaris is now going to
On 12 May 2010, at 07:34, Edward Martinez wrote:
Are you saying that nexenta contribute code to the opensolaris project?
if they do, then i should not really be concern about BIll Moore and Garrett
D'Amore joining Nexenta then. their work will still be within the
opensolaris
I was wondering with D'Amore jumping over to Nexenta. if the time comes to
take drastic measures, if they are willing and have the resources, can
something be organized with nexenta to become the fork?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
I am getting repetitive motion disorder just deleting all of the emails
in this thread. Really, you are hurting me. Isn't there something
more worthwhile that we can talk about? Can we create a separate forum
for OpenSolaris armchair speculators to blab away at each other without
bothering
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 6:12 PM, Edward Martinez mindbende...@live.com wrote:
I was wondering with D'Amore jumping over to Nexenta. if the time comes to
take drastic measures, if they are willing and have the resources, can
something be organized with nexenta to become the fork?
Troll.
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 6:12 PM, Edward Martinez
mindbende...@live.com wrote:
I was wondering with D'Amore jumping over to
Nexenta. if the time comes to take drastic
measures, if they are willing and have the
resources, can something be organized with nexenta
to become the fork?
Concerns are OK, but not the drastic moves you proposed... And combining
those, is not a good thing...
Matthias
You (Edward Martinez) wrote:
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 6:12 PM, Edward Martinez
mindbende...@live.com wrote:
I was wondering with D'Amore jumping over to
Nexenta. if
Concerns are OK, but not the drastic moves you
proposed... And combining
those, is not a good thing...
Matthias
ward Martinez) wrote:
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 6:12 PM, Edward Martinez
mindbende...@live.com wrote:
I was wondering with D'Amore jumping over to
Nexenta. if
can nexenta become the fork?
Just my opinion:
1. It cannot. Nexenta is mostly Ubuntu with OpenSolaris kernel. Nexenta
engineers do not contribute (much) to OpenSolaris codebase. They are Oracle
(Sun) engineers who do.
2. The fork is not needed. OpenSolaris is actively developed at Oracle and
On 11 May 2010, at 17:55, Edward Martinez wrote:
I'm sorry, with these kind if news i get concern and once i get concern
lot of ideas start flowing in my head on how i can help out.
Concerned about what? That somebody who was actively working on OpenSolaris is
now going to be...
28 matches
Mail list logo
