I've diddled around for 35 minutes googling for the release notes for
build 124 to see if something is in there about root logins.
Can some kind sole please direct me.
Google stings like `opensolaris release notes 2010'
`opensolaris release notes build 124
and etc have
Harry Putnam wrote:
I've diddled around for 35 minutes googling for the release notes for
build 124 to see if something is in there about root logins.
Can some kind sole please direct me.
Google stings like `opensolaris release notes 2010'
`opensolaris release notes build
Harry Putnam wrote:
I've diddled around for 35 minutes googling for the release notes for
build 124 to see if something is in there about root logins.
Can some kind sole please direct me.
Google stings like `opensolaris release notes 2010'
`opensolaris release notes build
Alan Coopersmith alan.coopersm...@sun.com
writes:
Harry Putnam wrote:
I've diddled around for 35 minutes googling for the release notes for
build 124 to see if something is in there about root logins.
Can some kind sole please direct me.
Google stings like `opensolaris release notes 2010'
Norm Jacobs norm.jac...@sun.com writes:
[...]
2. Configure pam(3PAM) to allow sshd to let you login to a role directly.
/etc/pam.conf
sshd-kbdint account required pam_unix_account.so.1
Haa... that was the baby... thanks.
But...er I already feel the noose
+--
| On 2009-10-15 19:48:14, Harry Putnam wrote:
|
| I'm still not finding it... I may be the lamest search technician
| known to man but I've spent way too much time at this point, looking
| for this... is it really the
On a side note...
Is there a good tutorial on why root as a role is better than root as an
account? I just can't seem to get my head around this. If someone has access
to my account, then they can use pfexec to do damage without even entering a
password. With a root account, disabled for
Actually, the default of assigning the main user the *profile* of
Primary Administrator is the loophole that leads to what you're
describing. It's a known issue tracked under bug 4885:
http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=4885
Gary Gendel wrote:
On a side note...
Is there a good
