> No, I don't speak Chinese, nor had I asked anyone to
> switch seats on
> the bus. I was previously unaware that my lack of
> education in that
> linguistic regard also meant that I was necessarily
> racist. That
> comes as a bit of a surprise to me, but thanks for
> the update.
Hi James,
Apol
No, what I meant is that Sun has a vested interest in pushing IIIMF, so Chinese
speaking people (who are interested in OpenSolaris) will have to swallow this
clearly inferior--at least as far as the zh-locales are concerned--technology,
which has been abandoned by everyone except Sun.
Of course
On Mon, 2008-10-06 at 18:22 -0700, Ché Kristo wrote:
> Before getting hostile :-) would you care to explain to us why the word is
> offensive?
> I'm all for cultural sensitivity but there is an onus on us all to help
> others understand
> our own culture...
If I put myself in his place and af
Before getting hostile :-) would you care to explain to us why the word is
offensive? I'm all for cultural sensitivity but there is an onus on us all to
help others understand our own culture...
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolari
Some background info:
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=76186&tstart=0
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=76186&tstart=0
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/message.jspa?messageID=288301#288301
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_
W. Wayne Liauh writes:
> Please don't EVER mention the word IIIMF, OK?
How else can I ask a question about an already-supported feature in
Solaris if I'm not permitted even to utter the name of the feature?
All I was asking about was the two (or several) competing technical
solutions to what appe
> Doesn't OpenSolaris already use IIIMF? What's the
> relationship
> between SCIM and IIIMF? What happens if different
> software teams
> choose one or the other framework so that both end up
> in use?
>
> --
> James Carlson, Solaris Networking
Please don't EVER mention the word IIIMF, OK?
Do you
