Glynn Foster writes:
On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 09:34 -0500, James Carlson wrote:
I still think it looks rather cheesy. First of all, there's the plain
old clutter problem. I wasn't thrilled with the excess of the CDDL
language (the original two-line copyright notice, though slightly
Christopher Mahan wrote:
Jim, how about giving them a @opensolaris.org email address? I know
some people that treasure their @apache.org addy.
Humm. This is interesting. I seem to remember this coming up with the
early governance discussions (either in the pilot or afterwards). I'll
check.
Glynn Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was suggesting that putting names into the source code was occasional
rather than be the norm [for example, when you create a new file],
When you like to add names into the source, you would need to do this for
External people and for Sun people in the
Glynn Foster wrote:
So, from a development point of view, I was somewhat surprised, having
never really looked at the ON code before, that there's no recognition
of people who wrote the code in the source files.
Are we unusual in this respect? How do other open source communities do
it?
Hey,
On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 09:34 -0500, James Carlson wrote:
I still think it looks rather cheesy. First of all, there's the plain
old clutter problem. I wasn't thrilled with the excess of the CDDL
language (the original two-line copyright notice, though slightly
annoying, was comparatively
Hi, guys.
We are 7 months into the project now, we are entering a new year, and I
think it's time start recognizing community members who are contributing
and participating in OpenSolaris. If you have an opinion on this, read
on ...
There's a lot going on around here. More than 10,000
Hey,
On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 15:24 -0800, Jim Grisanzio wrote:
So, what can we do to start recognizing more people more consistently?
And what is a reasonable list of items to recognize? Code for sure, but
we have other community members participating within
communities/projects, running
[ ... ]
of people who wrote the code in the source files. Sure, there's probably
some Teamware logs, but that doesn't feel as public as something like a
ChangeLog [1] or author credits in the source code headers.
I'm not with you on that. The Solaris sourcecode is the product of the
hard work
