Re: [osol-discuss] NX+freenx server binary tarball for Solaris

2008-03-08 Thread Roberto Dircio Palacios-Macedo
I'll post it on kraftek.com soon - rdircio This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org

Re: [osol-discuss] NX+freenx server binary tarball for Solaris

2008-03-08 Thread Roberto Dircio Palacios-Macedo
And if you build your own free nxserver production-quality implementation, a lot of end users, many poor schmucks and maybe some he/she-s will be very grateful. IT WILL JUST WORK. FCS ALL THE TIME. <-- this is your goal, go for it - rdircio This message posted from opensolaris.org _

Re: [osol-discuss] NX+freenx server binary tarball for Solaris

2008-03-08 Thread UNIX admin
> If you want a production-quality product you can PAY > the fine people at http://www.nomachine.com for the > NX server. The rest of us use freenx from > http://freenx.berlios.de That is just so wrong on so many levels, I don't even know where to begin. Tell you what. That just ticked me off enou

Re: [osol-discuss] NX+freenx server binary tarball for Solaris

2008-03-08 Thread Lukas Oboril
Roberto, good job. Could you post your step by step procedure of compilation and build? I would pay version from nomachine, but they haven't x86 version. On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 5:40 PM, Roberto Dircio Palacios-Macedo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > For a production-quality product you can pay the

Re: [osol-discuss] NX+freenx server binary tarball for Solaris

2008-03-08 Thread Roberto Dircio Palacios-Macedo
For a production-quality product you can pay the fine people at http://www.nomachine.com, the rest of us use freenx http://freenx.berlios.de/ ;) - rdircio - http:///www.kraftek.com This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss ma

Re: [osol-discuss] NX+freenx server binary tarball for Solaris

2008-03-08 Thread UNIX admin
> It's just a hack. Use it and be happy. If it works > for you, fine, if not, make it better, it's open > source. It is not meant to be an "integrated" thing > into opensolaris. Noone else mentioned anything about > "integration" in this forum. That's what I'm saying. It puts all the work of actua

Re: [osol-discuss] NX+freenx server binary tarball for Solaris

2008-03-08 Thread UNIX admin
> Nobody's forcing you to pay attention to anything > that isn't a > Fully Engineered Finished Product. > > But one of the steps that might eventually bring > something to that > illustrious status just might be having it convenient > enough that > some people (even if not you!) look at it, think

Re: [osol-discuss] NX+freenx server binary tarball for Solaris

2008-03-07 Thread Richard L. Hamilton
> > Roberto has clearly stated in his own forum that > the > > dependencies can be satisfied with installation of > > required Blastwave.org packages. Please excuse me > > for my ignorance, but wouldn't this dispose of the > > need for "integration"? > > No. > > Blastwave is good for casual use,

Re: [osol-discuss] NX+freenx server binary tarball for Solaris

2008-03-07 Thread W. Wayne Liauh
> It's just a hack. Use it and be happy. If it works > for you, fine, if not, make it better, it's open > source. It is not meant to be an "integrated" thing > into opensolaris. Noone else mentioned anything about > "integration" in this forum. > > Thanks > > - rdircio > - http://www.kraftek.com

Re: [osol-discuss] NX+freenx server binary tarball for Solaris

2008-03-07 Thread Roberto Dircio Palacios-Macedo
It's just a hack. Use it and be happy. If it works for you, fine, if not, make it better, it's open source. It is not meant to be an "integrated" thing into opensolaris. Seems you're the one that wants it to be "integrated", since noone else said anything about it in this forum. Thanks - rdirc

Re: [osol-discuss] NX+freenx server binary tarball for Solaris

2008-03-07 Thread UNIX admin
> Roberto has clearly stated in his own forum that the > dependencies can be satisfied with installation of > required Blastwave.org packages. Please excuse me > for my ignorance, but wouldn't this dispose of the > need for "integration"? No. Blastwave is good for casual use, but not more than t

Re: [osol-discuss] NX+freenx server binary tarball for Solaris

2008-03-07 Thread W. Wayne Liauh
> > It's obvious one can recompile and link the > binaries > > somewhere else like /opt/NX. > > It's easy. > > Recompiling is the easy part. Integration is the hard > one. And if you're bogged down in tons and tons of > other engineering work, it's too much effort to spare > on one more thing. Ro

Re: [osol-discuss] NX+freenx server binary tarball for Solaris

2008-03-07 Thread UNIX admin
> It's obvious one can recompile and link the binaries > somewhere else like /opt/NX. > It's easy. Recompiling is the easy part. Integration is the hard one. And if you're bogged down in tons and tons of other engineering work, it's too much effort to spare on one more thing. This message po

Re: [osol-discuss] NX+freenx server binary tarball for Solaris

2008-03-06 Thread Roberto Dircio Palacios-Macedo
It's obvious one can recompile and link the binaries somewhere else like /opt/NX. It's easy. - rdircio - http://www.kraftek.com This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org

Re: [osol-discuss] NX+freenx server binary tarball for Solaris

2008-03-05 Thread UNIX admin
> One of Sun's bloggers brought the subject of FreeNX > remote display server for OpenSolaris: > > http://blogs.sun.com/xavier/entry/freenx_opensolaris According to the above blog, he directly hacked under /usr/. You know what that means? NX is going to need a lot of integration work to bring t

[osol-discuss] NX+freenx server binary tarball for Solaris

2008-03-04 Thread W. Wayne Liauh
One of Sun's bloggers brought the subject of FreeNX remote display server for OpenSolaris: http://blogs.sun.com/xavier/entry/freenx_opensolaris See, also: http://www.kraftek.com/blog/index.php?/archives/227-NX+freenx-server-binary-tarball-for-Solaris-10-x86.html This is a very exciting develop