Re: [osol-discuss] On ksh and compatibility

2005-07-26 Thread Eric Boutilier
On Tue, 26 Jul 2005, Joerg Schilling wrote: > Eric Boutilier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tue, 26 Jul 2005, Keith M Wesolowski wrote: > > > On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 02:43:02PM +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote: > > > > > > > We have either _no_ ksh in OpenSolaris or we have ksh93. > > > > > > Plea

Re: [osol-discuss] On ksh and compatibility

2005-07-26 Thread Joerg Schilling
Eric Boutilier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 26 Jul 2005, Keith M Wesolowski wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 02:43:02PM +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote: > > > > > We have either _no_ ksh in OpenSolaris or we have ksh93. > > > > Please take time out and think about what you're suggesting. >

Re: [osol-discuss] On ksh and compatibility

2005-07-26 Thread Eric Boutilier
On Tue, 26 Jul 2005, Keith M Wesolowski wrote: > On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 02:43:02PM +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote: > > > We have either _no_ ksh in OpenSolaris or we have ksh93. > > Please take time out and think about what you're suggesting. Keith -- when Joerg says OpenSolaris here, I think he's

[osol-discuss] On ksh and compatibility

2005-07-26 Thread Keith M Wesolowski
On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 02:43:02PM +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote: > We have either _no_ ksh in OpenSolaris or we have ksh93. Please take time out and think about what you're suggesting. Intentionally breaking compatibility with Solaris has the following implications: Beginning immediately, appli