Re: [osol-discuss] OpenSolaris 2008.11

2010-04-22 Thread Giovanni Tirloni
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 3:48 PM, Vishal Ahuja wrote: > Hi All, > > If I use the priocntl command to change the class of a process from > 'Interactive' to 'Real time', and set its priority to 59, how does this > process fare against other user and kernel processes in the system. > RT threads have

[osol-discuss] OpenSolaris 2008.11

2010-04-22 Thread Vishal Ahuja
Hi All, If I use the priocntl command to change the class of a process from 'Interactive' to 'Real time', and set its priority to 59, how does this process fare against other user and kernel processes in the system. Thank you Vish ___ opensolaris-discus

[osol-discuss] OpenSolaris 2008.11 LIVE CD Boot failure

2009-05-14 Thread Saravanan N
Hi , I am having issue when I try to boot off from Opensolaris Live CD (0811.iso or 0811-global.iso). The following error message appears in the screen. SunOS Release 5.11 Version snv_101b 64-bit Copyright blah Use is subject blah Hostname: opensolaris Remounting root read/write Probing for

[osol-discuss] OpenSolaris 2008.11 and modified Sun LSImega driver

2009-05-02 Thread russell aspinwall
Hi, I use a modified Sun SUNWlsimega driver (tweaked to recognise the LSI MegaRAID SATA300-8X raid controller ) and after upgrading to Solaris 7 update 7 my computer failed to boot. As I took a backup on an external USB 1TB drive I thought I would give OpenSolaris 2008.11 a try. Booting from th

Re: [osol-discuss] OpenSolaris 2008.11 and OpenGroup

2009-04-01 Thread C. Bergström
Dennis Clarke wrote: M. Oliver Ghingold wrote: If not, why hasn't OpenSolaris been registered with the OpenGroup? The certification and registration process is time consuming and expensive. how expensive ? Are we talking internal costs and infrastructure or a fee? Is this $1

Re: [osol-discuss] OpenSolaris 2008.11 and OpenGroup

2009-04-01 Thread Dennis Clarke
> M. Oliver Ghingold wrote: >> If not, why hasn't OpenSolaris been registered with the OpenGroup? > > The certification and registration process is time consuming and > expensive. how expensive ? Are we talking internal costs and infrastructure or a fee? Is this $10K or $10M ? Dennis

Re: [osol-discuss] OpenSolaris 2008.11 and OpenGroup

2009-04-01 Thread Alan Coopersmith
M. Oliver Ghingold wrote: > If not, why hasn't OpenSolaris been registered with the OpenGroup? The certification and registration process is time consuming and expensive. Sun has traditionally only done this for full releases of Solaris, such as the initial releases of Solaris 7, 8, 9, and 10, an

Re: [osol-discuss] OpenSolaris 2008.11 and OpenGroup

2009-04-01 Thread M. Oliver Ghingold
Ah. My mistake. One question down, one to go. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org

Re: [osol-discuss] OpenSolaris 2008.11 and OpenGroup

2009-04-01 Thread Ignacio Marambio Catán
http://www.opengroup.org/openbrand/register/brand3493.htm On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 11:53 AM, M. Oliver Ghingold wrote: > According to OpenGroup's website, Solaris 10 for x86_64 systems was never > registered with the OpenGroup for Unix 03 certification. No version of > OpenSolaris has been regist

[osol-discuss] OpenSolaris 2008.11 and OpenGroup

2009-04-01 Thread M. Oliver Ghingold
According to OpenGroup's website, Solaris 10 for x86_64 systems was never registered with the OpenGroup for Unix 03 certification. No version of OpenSolaris has been registered, either. Has Sun broken compliance with some of the terms of the Single Unix Specification during the transition to x8

[osol-discuss] opensolaris 2008.11 cdrom0 problem on VMware

2009-03-17 Thread Simon Hardy-Francis
So I installed opensolaris 2008.11 on VMware Workstation 6.5.1 -- as many people have blogged about. Problem is when I try to use the cdrom... it just doesn't seem to work. All I have is two broken links: /cdrom/cdrom0 -> ./opensolaris /cdrom/opensolaris -> /media/OpenSolaris Any ideas how to deb

[osol-discuss] OpenSolaris 2008.11 on Netbooks

2009-01-22 Thread Chad Kellerman
Hello, I see the Samsung NC10 is under the HCL. http://www.sun.com/bigadmin/hcl/data/systems/details/23525.html but all it says is that's it's reported to work. Anyone running OpenSolaris on an Acer Aspire One or a Samsung NC10? Just wondering about performance, ZFS on SSD?, and hardware suppo