Well, I would have to say this is an entirely different situation, as
the majority of OpenSolaris developers are currently getting paid to
work on OpenSolaris.
So don't let the Debian issue factor into your position...
-Brian
On 5/14/07, Venky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There was one bit of
On 14/05/07, Calum Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2007-05-14 at 10:47 +0530, Venky wrote:
The bounty system, on the other hand, has a track record of
working much better than hand-picked developers getting paid for
their work.
A lot of maintainers in the GNOME community didn't like
My view is that bounties are best handled for contained single man
projects and tasks, e.g. - develop driver for X chip, port xyz small
app to OpenSolaris (vs. large community maintained projects.)
For large community projects, generally it makes sense to support
individual developers, such that
There was one bit of news from CommunityOne (i.e. the JavaOne pre-show)
that I thought might have interesting consequences for the OpenSolaris
community. That was the proposal to pay open source developers for
their work. That doesn't seem like a bad idea and I am wondering how
such a
There was one bit of news from CommunityOne (i.e. the JavaOne pre-show)
that I thought might have interesting consequences for the OpenSolaris
community. That was the proposal to pay open source developers for
their work. That doesn't seem like a bad idea and I am wondering how
such a thing
On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 09:44:26AM -0400, Bill Rushmore wrote:
There was one bit of news from CommunityOne (i.e. the JavaOne pre-show) that
I thought might have interesting consequences for the OpenSolaris community.
That was the proposal to pay open source developers for their work.
Bill Rushmore wrote:
There was one bit of news from CommunityOne (i.e. the JavaOne
pre-show) that I thought might have interesting consequences for the
OpenSolaris community. That was the proposal to pay open source
developers for their work. That doesn't seem like a bad idea and I am
