"Cyril Plisko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11/17/06, Rick McNeal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There are other reasons too. At least one of the AHCI team member
> has his (previously working) email address rejected with
>
> 550 5.1.1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... User unknown
>
Maybe he was the ta
On 11/17/06, Rick McNeal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Nov 16, 2006, at 3:42 PM, Danek Duvall wrote:
> Of course, there's still no way to force them to respond even once
> you've
> sent them personal email, but one would hope they'd get the message
> (so to
> speak).
Unless they've got filters
On Nov 16, 2006, at 3:42 PM, Danek Duvall wrote:
Of course, there's still no way to force them to respond even once
you've
sent them personal email, but one would hope they'd get the message
(so to
speak).
Unless they've got filters enabled which toss out mail from the
outside world exc
