Ok, your claim that Linux has gotten
better is well taken. Let's
move on.
Alright - there is no further reason for debate. I generally try and avoid
flaming people and succeed quite a few times but if I lost control some times,
please forgive.
I am watching the Solaris bugzilla with the
b If you use an email client - reply to the mailing list only. Do NOT reply
to me as it will bounce./b
br
br
I'm sure they claim linear scalability *for some
benchmarks*.
Probably the STREAMs benchmarks which is meant to
scale linearly on
NUMA systems (if it doesn't, the system is broken)
If you use an email client - reply to the mailing list only. Do NOT reply to
me as it will bounce.
I fyou want any more responses then want you to mail with a proper
email address.
What makes you think on all other counts Linux will fail to scale
miserably? I would be curious to hear if you
biIf you use an email client - reply to the mailing list only. Do NOT reply
to me as it will bounce. /i/b
br br
Why? If Linux performs well with 32 bits and mind you the Linux numbers go from
1 CPU to 8CPU as opposed to the 2-CPU to 4-CPU Solaris figures, meaning clearly
Linux is at a good
On Monday 10 October 2005 14:54, S Destika wrote:
Why? If Linux performs well with 32 bits and mind you the Linux numbers go
from 1 CPU to 8CPU as opposed to the 2-CPU to 4-CPU Solaris figures,
meaning clearly Linux is at a good amount of disadvantage and still
performs reasonably well (ie.
Thanks for a good laugh. GDB doesn't work between 2 kernel versions - that was
hilarious. I mean yeah, I can hack a kernel which disables ptrace support and
tell the world this hilarious story of no workie! And if you didn't knew -
Linux kernel is different from GDB - GDB is userspace thing,
