I wasn't discussing how good Redhat or Suse's support is - Even Sun support has
sucked upon me - it all depends on who is handling your case.
Can you detail which apps broke upon you recently and since you claim to be
knowing more than RH support does, do you know why they were broken? I mean
On 10/11/05, S Destika [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wasn't discussing how good Redhat or Suse's support is - Even Sun
support has sucked upon me - it all depends on who is handling your
case.
I can't say Sun ever made stuff up when they couldn't help me. They
also publish Bug IDs that are fixed
S Destika wrote:
I was expecting one *community inspired* reply from Sun guys - all replies
I got were targetted at selling Solaris at the expense of spreading FUD
against Linux either due to vested interests in selling Solaris or due to
plain misunderstanding.
So given that you started
Hey you have clearly gone long back in time - gdb doesn't work for you, linux
kernel on SMP is a joke - all retro talk. It's 2005 - wake up!! Linux has near
perfect SMP scalability today - it works fine on a 512 CPU Itanium.
As far as stability goes - If you run well tested vendor kernels
I don't mean to start a flamewar - I already said Solaris has gotten a lot
better with S10 but come on - it still has slower fork, slower thread creation
the last I checked even on S10. The SPEC benchmarks also are a piece of Crap,
are they?
All I was saying to the OP was that if he uses 1-2
--- Cyril Plisko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2005-10-08 at 07:35 -0700, S Destika wrote:
I don't mean to start a flamewar - I already said
Solaris has gotten a lot better with S10 but come on
- it still has slower fork, slower thread creation
the last I checked even on S10. The SPEC
