On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 10:11:37AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >you cant support source only packages and let your users compile them
> >anyway they want, there are simply too many variables to consider. I
> >think you actually void the support from redhat if you dont use one of
> >the pro
> I've worked in places where system administrators
> hacked source code
> which was available (BSD Unix, source licenses).
>
> Invariably, it is a *bad* idea; but that point is
> never driven home
> until one of the administrators does leave or is hit
> by a truck.
Well, there must be a reason
>you cant support source only packages and let your users compile them
>anyway they want, there are simply too many variables to consider. I
>think you actually void the support from redhat if you dont use one of
>the provided kernels.
>imho, source code availability is a plus but to your regular
--- Ignacio Marambio Catán <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> >
> > I love the desktop analogies. People use Fedora in
> > server farms. I have used Fedora in server farms.
> We
> > are most definitely interested in the source code.
> How
> > else are we suppose to integrate previously
> > half/non-int
I love the desktop analogies. People use Fedora in
server farms. I have used Fedora in server farms. We
are most definitely interested in the source code. How
else are we suppose to integrate previously
half/non-integrated pieces of software together?
i'd fire any of my sysadmins if i ever catc
--- Ignacio Marambio Catán <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > Maybe not the kernel sources if we are not
> developers.
> > I would say the chances of interest in other
> packages
> > that come along with the distribution are much
> higher
> > than 0.1%.
> i really really doubt that, the sources are
Maybe not the kernel sources if we are not developers.
I would say the chances of interest in other packages
that come along with the distribution are much higher
than 0.1%.
i really really doubt that, the sources are quite useless actually,
what you really use are the derived binaries, check fi
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >I've probably a bad idea,but for me "to make
> Solaris more linux like"
> >is to have an opensolaris distro with all sources
> (sources for every
> >package) and a desktop like Ubuntu or RH.Is this an
> open community? Is
> >this open source?
>
> I find that a
>I've probably a bad idea,but for me "to make Solaris more linux like"
>is to have an opensolaris distro with all sources (sources for every
>package) and a desktop like Ubuntu or RH.Is this an open community? Is
>this open source?
I find that a strange way to look at "more Linux like".
I would
I've probably a bad idea,but for me "to make Solaris more linux like" is to
have an opensolaris distro with all sources (sources for every package) and a
desktop like Ubuntu or RH.Is this an open community? Is this open source?
Giacomo
___
OpenSolaris - The
10 matches
Mail list logo
