"S.K. Sammandam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The crossmeta driver binary on Windows is free without any warranty.
> The addon driver modules from Linux is open-source, whereas The crossmeta
> kernel based on freebsd VFS is
> not open-source yet. This has to do with the Microsoft IFS licensing an
The crossmeta driver binary on Windows is free without any warranty.
The addon driver modules from Linux is open-source, whereas The crossmeta
kernel based on freebsd VFS is
not open-source yet. This has to do with the Microsoft IFS licensing and their
header files.
Once the JANUS project is avai
"S.K. Sammandam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How about having all of them .. Check out http://www.crossmeta.com that
> provides the following file systems UFS/FFS, EXT2, XFS, reiserfs for Windows.
> I also think XFS would be damn good for opensolaris.
Is it OSS?
What license does it use?
> On Sunday 04 September 2005 01:26 am, Ben Rockwood
> wrote:
> > But, back to the origonal post... of all the
> filesystems on Linux I
> > think ReiserFS would be on the bottom of my list.
> ext2/3 is what people
> > need. XFS/JFS would be damned nice.
>
How about having all of them .. Check o
Captain Nemo wrote:
Indeed,
Why at all we should trust russian barbarians ? I new some and frankly, they all seem to be the real morons.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Indeed,
Why at all we should trust russian barbarians ? I new some and frankly, they
all seem to be the real morons.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On 9/9/05, Richard Elling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Sorry Ben, i did mean exactly as I said it, I will NEVER support
> > reiserFS I used it for a while a few years ago, and it corrupted my
> > data, this wasn't some alpha or beta version or as the result of the
> > system loosing power, this w
> Sorry Ben, i did mean exactly as I said it, I will NEVER support
> reiserFS I used it for a while a few years ago, and it corrupted my
> data, this wasn't some alpha or beta version or as the result of the
> system loosing power, this was the default stable version in a stable
> enviroment, and i
I see someone has used /sbin/reiserfsck <--- (replace "s" with "u")
I saved about 300MB by converting to Reiser3.6 over EXT3 (on a 6gb
partition) but I later scrambled all the data on that partition when
the FS would not mount and I tried to fix it.
On 9/5/05, James Dickens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
that's just your personal experience. My personal experience is that I have
recovered with reiserfs better than ext3...yes, you heard that right. reisefs
3.6 is as stable it gets, have been running it for about 2 years now. My system
hard powered off many times during these years, never once I h
Shawn Walker wrote:
On 9/5/05, James Dickens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 9/5/05, S Destika <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes - Reiser3 , contrary to what people are saying is a good, stable FS which has it's
benefits above others.
Reiser4 seems to be getting stable but I don't know for certai
On 9/5/05, James Dickens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/5/05, S Destika <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Yes - Reiser3 , contrary to what people are saying is a good, stable FS
> > which has it's benefits above others.
> > Reiser4 seems to be getting stable but I don't know for certain. (Feature
On 9/5/05, S Destika <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes - Reiser3 , contrary to what people are saying is a good, stable FS which
> has it's benefits above others.
> Reiser4 seems to be getting stable but I don't know for certain. (Feature
> wise it' s more promising than any of the other existing
Yes - Reiser3 , contrary to what people are saying is a good, stable FS which
has it's benefits above others.
Reiser4 seems to be getting stable but I don't know for certain. (Feature wise
it' s more promising than any of the other existing file systems on Linux but
not sure if any one immedia
14 matches
Mail list logo
