On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 11:06:30AM +0100, Darren J Moffat wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Besides, doing this in java isn't all that hard. The downside
is the memory footprint.
One issue with running the GUI in Java is getting the security
and authentication right; this often requires
On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 10:40:18PM -0700, changho.kim
wrote:
Solaris have tools to control service by system.
That's called SMF
This is important role of self healing but every
solaris beginner
have difficulty in input command by keyboard.
if user don't familiar with keyboard, they
On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 01:31 -0700, Bob Palowoda wrote:
On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 10:40:18PM -0700, changho.kim
wrote:
Solaris have tools to control service by system.
That's called SMF
This is important role of self healing but every
solaris beginner
have difficulty in input
On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 09:45, Erast Benson wrote:
Though the ultimate goal is to do a lot more, the
prototype for the
Visual Panels project (screenshots, demo, and source
at
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/vpanels/
currently contains a basic SMF GUI. Please check it
Besides, doing this in java isn't all that hard. The downside
is the memory footprint.
One issue with running the GUI in Java is getting the security
and authentication right; this often requires roll-your-own which
is way too hard for most to get right.
Casper
On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 12:05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Besides, doing this in java isn't all that hard. The downside
is the memory footprint.
One issue with running the GUI in Java is getting the security
and authentication right; this often requires roll-your-own which
is way too hard for
On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 01:31:23AM -0700, Bob Palowoda wrote:
Though the ultimate goal is to do a lot more, the prototype for the
Visual Panels project (screenshots, demo, and source at
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/vpanels/
) currently contains a basic SMF GUI. Please check
On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 01:45:35AM -0700, Erast Benson wrote:
Don't you think using Java for this kind of things a bit of overhead?
Its not like this app will be running on OSX or Windows.. why bother
with Java then?
We actually think it would be really valuable for people to be able
to
On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 15:19 -0700, David Powell wrote:
On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 01:45:35AM -0700, Erast Benson wrote:
Don't you think using Java for this kind of things a bit of overhead?
Its not like this app will be running on OSX or Windows.. why bother
with Java then?
We actually
