RE: [osol-discuss] Re: Re: Laptop Power Management? GUI or Shell based?

2005-07-29 Thread Albertson, Brett
--Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of W. Wayne Liauh Sent: Friday, July 29, 2005 2:46 PM To: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org Subject: [osol-discuss] Re: Re: Laptop Power Management? GUI or Shell based? I think my problem is related to the fact that

[osol-discuss] Re: Re: Laptop Power Management? GUI or Shell based?

2005-07-29 Thread W. Wayne Liauh
I think my problem is related to the fact that I provided a wrong answer to the "subnet" question during installation. Netstat shows that my router info is all messed up (this machine was connected to a router, but the host was listed as the default gateway, and no gateway was provided for the

[osol-discuss] Re: Re: Laptop Power Management? GUI or Shell based?

2005-07-29 Thread W. Wayne Liauh
I thought the installation scripts for FCS (thanks to Casper, now I know that this term, at the present time, means Solaris 10) belong too much in the stone age (compared to Fedora Core), and actually expected SE to be closer to the modern day Linux. Well, to make my story short, I definitely

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Re: Laptop Power Management? GUI or Shell based?

2005-07-28 Thread Casper . Dik
>1. Sound: on a notebook I don't really care anyway; but it didn't work on my >Fedora Core 4, eithe r; What type of sound? Tried oss? >2. Scroll bar on the touch pad: this is very important in web/file browsing; >it works with FC4; WHat type? If Synaptics, it'll soon work. >3. Wi-Fi: ne

[osol-discuss] Re: Re: Laptop Power Management? GUI or Shell based?

2005-07-28 Thread W. Wayne Liauh
Ooh Shoot. Just installed Solaris 10 on my new HP ze2000 notebook (late) last nite. Looks like I'll have to re-do it with SE 07/05 :-( Solaris 10 was installed on the HP ze2000 (a very inexpensive Turion64 machine) in a quad-boot configuration. Everything seems to be working fine except: