On Tuesday 11 October 2005 10:52 am, David Schanen wrote:
Well, it wasn't my decision to go with Linux in general or Redhat in
particular, but I wouldn't have necessarily lobbied against it had I
been a part of the process at the time.
I've been faced with similar decisions, and I can
Hello S,
Saturday, October 8, 2005, 5:06:46 AM, you wrote:
SD It's common knowledge for any technical person that Linux is faster than
Solaris. Till Solaris 10 the gap in performance was _huge_. I speak this from
realworld experience. But people who have
SD used Solaris 10 claim it has gotten
On Monday 10 October 2005 02:37 am, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Alan DuBoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 07 October 2005 08:06 pm, S Destika wrote:
It's common knowledge for any technical person that Linux is faster
than Solaris. Till Solaris 10 the gap in performance was _huge_. I
Alan DuBoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We haven't even brought up the great tools yet...have you ever tried to debug
with gdb? I haven't tried recentely, but as of a year or two back, it
couldn't reliably support re-entrancy into a shared library. Although to give
it credit you could enter
On Monday 10 October 2005 05:19 am, Joerg Schilling wrote:
So debugging on Linux is what Brian Cantrill calls sending a new debug
airplane with 300 new passengers over the ocean in hope that it will crash
too just in oder to find the reason instead of checking the rests of the
one machine that
[...]
For the most part, all Linux systems are debug systems.
[...]
We run Linux in all our production environments on different platforms
(IA64, X86_64, X86) and I'm personally VERY happy with it. Production means
SAP databases/instances with ~ 900 users. Although SAP is not a benchmark
itself
On 10/10/05, S Destika [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You don't need to patch the Kernel on your own if you use vendor supported
ones. You are comparing freeware Linux distro with paid Solaris support.
Enterprises go with RHEL, SLES and with support - Redhat/SuSE fix whatever is
busted.
There
On Monday 10 October 2005 08:47 pm, David Schanen wrote:
On 10/10/05, S Destika [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You don't need to patch the Kernel on your own if you use vendor
supported ones. You are comparing freeware Linux distro with paid
Solaris support.
Enterprises go with RHEL, SLES
On Monday 10 October 2005 08:47 pm, David Schanen wrote:
I administer a cluster of RHEL3 machines actually
David,
I'd like to ask you a question in regards to Linux and Solaris. You've
mentioned that you administer systems running RHEL 3, arguably the most
common Linux running in production
.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: Theo Schlossnagle
To: S Destika
Cc: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Sent: Saturday, October 08, 2005 12:11 AM
Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Re: Sparc ? x86 Comparison
Linux can beat solaris hands down running autoconf and ./configure. In fact
On Fri, 7 Oct 2005, S Destika wrote:
It's common knowledge for any technical person that Linux is faster
I think you mean that it was a common *opinion*.
than Solaris. Till Solaris 10 the gap in performance was _huge_. I
In some, perhaps many, lower end cases, Linux did have a performance
S Destika wrote:
It's common knowledge for any technical person that Linux is faster than Solaris. Till Solaris 10 the gap in performance was _huge_. I speak this from realworld experience. But people who have used Solaris 10 claim it has gotten a lot better.
As do the recent benchmarks.
On Friday 07 October 2005 08:06 pm, S Destika wrote:
It's common knowledge for any technical person that Linux is faster than
Solaris. Till Solaris 10 the gap in performance was _huge_. I speak this
from realworld experience. But people who have used Solaris 10 claim it has
gotten a lot
13 matches
Mail list logo
