Horvath writes:
> 2. Is there a way to reinstall Solaris with ZFS instead of UFS?
No, because the boot system cannot yet boot from ZFS.
> 3. No it's not a matter of having a bleeding-edge tools. My question was
> about any pkg in Solaris, how can I update a pkg in Solaris to be short?
For Solar
2. Is there a way to reinstall Solaris with ZFS instead of UFS?
3. No it's not a matter of having a bleeding-edge tools. My question was about
any pkg in Solaris, how can I update a pkg in Solaris to be short?
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
> That's too strong especially when talking about raidz
> vs HW raid-5.
> Depending on workload raidz can give you much worse
> performance (or
> better). Additionally current hot spare support in
> ZFS is far from
> perfect.
Probably the best thing to do in OP's case is to run some tests and get
> environment with AMPS (Apache MySQL, PHP, Solaris)
>
> The other discussion in this thread notwithstanding,
> I think PostgreSQL would be the better database to mention.
I can't seem to get anything that works with PostgreSQL
APPS, PAPS, SPAP, SAPP
I guess SPAR (Solaris, PostgreSQL, Ap
> That's a variant on the old DEC number plate:
>
>
> live free or die
>
> U N I X
That'll work too.
I don't know how I ever did without UNIX.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolar
On Tue, 6 Sep 2005, Daniel Johnsen wrote:
Wow, do you think it's easily portable to the Linux
kernel?
How long do you think it might take them?
That was one of the questions I hoped to get answered with this thread
;) "What do you think / Do you know, how much % of the zfs code
needs/neede
> Wow, do you think it's easily portable to the Linux
> kernel?
>
> How long do you think it might take them?
>
That was one of the questions I hoped to get answered with this thread ;)
"What do you think / Do you know, how much % of the zfs code needs/needed to be
rewritten ?"
Anyway I doubt
