> TECHNOLOGY ALERT
> from The Wall Street Journal.
>
> Sunday, Jan. 21, 2007
>
> Sun and Intel have been negotiating an agreement
> under which Sun would buy
> Intel chips for use in server systems. Such a deal
> would be a blow to AMD,
> currently Sun's exclusive supplier for chips based on
> th
>Intel also agrees to endorse Solaris. Intel has a sizable contingent
>working on Linux compatibili ty. It should be expected that some of
>them will be switched to Solaris (in comparison, we still y et to hear
>ANYTHING about any work, or any promise therefor, on porting the
>proprietary ATI dr
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Sun (not SUN) did not refuse to port Solaris to Itanium; Sun *did*
> port Solaris to Itanium (I have a poloshirt commemorating the bringup
> of Solaris on Itanium, it says "Sunrise on Merced"). The falling out
> had other reasons, but that's all water under the bridge..
>> Sun (not SUN) did not refuse to port Solaris to Itanium; Sun *did*
>> port Solaris to Itanium (I have a poloshirt commemorating the bringup
>> of Solaris on Itanium, it says "Sunrise on Merced"). The falling out
>> had other reasons, but that's all water under the bridge...
>
>It would be inte
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm not sure what rumours you've heard about the Solaris/Itanium
> cancellation, but I've never heard 32 bit compatibility figuring in them.
I heard that Intel did not ship real HW to Sun although Solaris was the first
port because Sun did not plan to add 32 bit compat
And what do you know, the live webcast even works with Solaris/x86
(Solaris Nevada, b56, Fujitsu S2110; Turion :-)
Casper
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On Mon, 22 Jan 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> And what do you know, the live webcast even works with Solaris/x86
>
> (Solaris Nevada, b56, Fujitsu S2110; Turion :-)
Solaris Nevada, b54, Ultra 20, Opteron 152. :-)
--
Rich Teer, SCSA, SCNA, SCSECA, OpenSolaris CAB member
President,
Rite Onli
