[osol-discuss] Re: Unkillable Processes

2006-12-17 Thread Ben Rockwood
You guys are the kings. Indeed it was bug 6455727. And indeed that DTrace one-liner illuminated the problem where no other tool could. The resolution was simple, add the following line to lighttpd.conf: server.network-backend = writev The Blastwave package is built with this backend, so its

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Unkillable Processes

2006-12-17 Thread Bill Rushmore
Ben Rockwood wrote: You guys are the kings. Indeed it was bug 6455727. And indeed that DTrace one-liner illuminated the problem where no other tool could. The resolution was simple, add the following line to lighttpd.conf: server.network-backend = writev The Blastwave package is built with

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Unkillable Processes

2006-12-17 Thread Dennis Clarke
Ben Rockwood wrote: You guys are the kings. Indeed it was bug 6455727. And indeed that DTrace one-liner illuminated the problem where no other tool could. The resolution was simple, add the following line to lighttpd.conf: server.network-backend = writev The Blastwave package is built

[osol-discuss] Re: Unkillable Processes

2006-12-17 Thread Akhilesh Mritunjai
Hi Slightly OT on reading benr saying that comments are not visible. OpenSolaris being an open community, it seems strange that the comments on bugs are still not public. Being employed in a large organization, I know that most comments are less than ideal for public consumption :-) , but I'd

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Unkillable Processes

2006-12-17 Thread Alan Coopersmith
Akhilesh Mritunjai wrote: Hi Slightly OT on reading benr saying that comments are not visible. OpenSolaris being an open community, it seems strange that the comments on bugs are still not public. The problem is the comments section was not just used for commenting on bugs, but for 10 years